From Deseret News archives:

U. scientists gathering Nevada quake data

Published: Friday, Feb. 22, 2008 12:54 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Earthquake scientists stressed Thursday that the Wells, Nev., quake was not related to the Wasatch Fault that runs through highly populated areas of Utah and that it was extremely unlikely to trigger any movement of that fault.

"There's nothing that I understand to suggest anything will be happening on the Wasatch Fault," said Kristine Pankow, assistant director of the University of Utah Seismograph Stations.

The system of faults involved in the Nevada event was the Independence Valley Fault Zone, not Utah's Wasatch Fault. But Pankow said it should serve as a wake-up call because "we're in earthquake country, and these events — though infrequent — happen here." And experts agree that the Wasatch Fault is due for a stronger earthquake.

U. earth scientists drove toward the epicenter of the Wells quake on Thursday, taking portable seismic detectors to record detailed information about the depth, direction, intensity and ground movement of aftershocks.

By 10 a.m. MST, less than three hours after the first strong shaking, there were around 20 aftershocks of magnitude 3.0 and larger recorded by the stations' equipment in Utah, Pankow said.

Story continues below
Throughout Thursday the National Earthquake Information Center in Denver listed several aftershocks smaller than 3.0, although at 4:57 p.m. Utah time, a sizable aftershock was recorded at 4.6 magnitude. Aftershocks were occurring "primarily west of the main shock," according to Susanne Janecke, associate professor of geology at Utah State University.

The center listed the Nevada main earthquake as magnitude 6.0, located 12 miles east of Wells and 151 miles west of Salt Lake City. The break occurred about 5.6 miles beneath the surface at 6:16 a.m. local time (7:16 a.m. in Utah). Residents reported they felt it as far away as Salt Lake City, Ogden, Logan and Delta in Utah, and in more distant locations in Idaho.

Pankow said scientists "want to know where the aftershocks are occurring with a higher precision, and with the current distribution of stations we can't do that." Together with specialists from the University of Nevada at Reno and the U.S. Geological Survey, the Utahns were setting up specialized instruments near the epicenter.

The U. planned to deploy five to 10 monitors, she said. Small aftershocks could continue for weeks or months, according to Pankow.

The Wells event is considered a moderate earthquake. "But we have to keep in mind that damage relates more to the built environment," she said. "So if you have a lot of older buildings or weak construction, a magnitude 6 can do some significant damage."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

How can Cincinnati Leap over TCU to No. 4 on a last second missed extra point...

Mr. Holmoe, taking the necessary action requires leadership. If you are not...

Utes excited to go to San Diego

Guess we'll find out if your logic holds next year. Breaking in a new QB...

Store planning for Palin crush

RE: Todd | 4:19 p.m. | 4:40 p.m. Dec. 7, 2009 Democratic (possiably...

Your response is pretty "fishy" too. Anyway royalty isn't red; even its...

Letters: Global warming a lie

No debate is allowed. "Climategate" has verified that if you criticize...

Normally I would cheer for BYU against Oregon State but seeing that I have no...

UTe fans logic? | 4:34 p.m. Dec. 7, 2009 It doesn't matter that Wynn will...

Editorial: Iran up to old tricks

Isn't it funny how a nation like Iran, who has never invaded another nation...

CJ,first off,no one hates you but a bunch of us question your commitment and...

Advertisements