From Deseret News archives:

Huntsman veto fight looms

Published: Thursday, Feb. 14, 2008 12:02 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Lawmakers on Wednesday threw down the gauntlet to Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr., who now must decide whether he'll veto what legislators call a "separation of powers" bill.

By more than a two-thirds vote — which is needed to override a threatened gubernatorial veto — House members passed SB144, a bill that would require Huntsman to get legislative approval before he enters into any interstate agreement that could cost the state more than $50,000.

Huntsman told the Deseret Morning News last week that he would veto SB144 if it came to his desk. And Huntsman's spokeswoman, Lisa Roskelley, said Wednesday afternoon that the governor's position "remains the same" — in other words, he will probably veto the measure.

Now it will go to his desk, since the bill has already passed the Senate. SB144 also passed the Senate by more than a two-thirds vote.

Once the bill officially goes to Huntsman's office, because the Legislature is still in session, he'll have 10 days to sign it, veto it or let it become law without his signature. If he vetoes it, it looks like legislators will still have time before their March 5 adjournment to take an override veto vote.

If both houses vote to override with more than two-thirds vote, the bill will become law.

Story continues below
While legislative Republicans deny it, others see SB144 as a reaction to Huntsman's very public decision last year to stand with California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on an interstate climate change agreement.

Schwarzenegger is seen as a liberal Republican, especially on environmental issues, and a number of Utah Republicans were not happy to see Huntsman agreeing to the climate initiative.

But Rep. Kevin Garn, R-Layton, the House sponsor of SB144, told representatives Wednesday that he knew of no new interstate agreements that led to the bill.

"Hasn't the governor had for years this same power to make these agreements?" Rep. Neil Hansen, D-Ogden, asked. "What has brought it to a head now?"

It's just that the legislative branch of government has to protect its constitutional functions, said Garn.

Sponsor Sen. Scott Jenkins, R-Plain City, said he amended his bill to include the $50,000 threshold as an accommodation to Huntsman.

But Rep. Sheryl Allen, R-Bountiful, said she fears that money may be wasted in having to call the Legislature into a special session to authorize various relatively minor interstate agreements.


E-mail: bbjr@desnews.com

Recent comments

Dear DCF, etal.

John Hunstman is a silver spoon fed child who has...

Reality Check | Feb. 14, 2008 at 3:49 p.m.

Something stuck about some of the responses. Some have applauded...

DCF | Feb. 14, 2008 at 2:31 p.m.

Interesting, Utah doing this might just set a bellweather event that...

Bellweather | Feb. 14, 2008 at 1:52 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

McKay is A-OK in his return

To say that Collie would lobby for the ball? Puuullleeeaaassseee! Collie was...

Water wars in Snake Valley

I agree that pumping the aquifers in nothern nevada or anywhere else is...

What a lovely, extraordinary reminder of important matters. I wonder where I...

TCU moves into 4th place in BCS

The Ute played their worst opponent in some time (years. That is not a good...

House passes health care bill

I give the GOP credit for at least acknowledging we have a problem and for...

The increasing unemployment of democrats will naturally result in an overall...

Hey TCU, you guys got this one in the bag. Don't practice, scheme or prepare...

Anonymous seems to have a bone to pick, the comments about ..."It's not just...

I have never met anyone who pouts naturally - maybe I just haven't met enough...

It is your year South Summit. Go make it happen.

Advertisements
Advertisement