From Deseret News archives:

Huntsman will veto any limits to power

Some lawmakers want say on interstate pacts

Published: Tuesday, Feb. 12, 2008 12:09 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. says he will veto a Senate bill that would restrict his ability to make interstate agreements — like he did last year with California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger over climate changes.

"I don't like that idea," reflected in SB144, Huntsman told the Deseret Morning News.

So, he was asked, legislators had better get two-thirds' vote in both houses — needed for a veto override?

"Yes, in a nutshell."

Both Huntsman and Sen. Scott Jenkins, R-Plain City, sponsor of SB144, said the issue is not personal.

"It is a question of power, of balance of power" between the legislative and executive branches of government, Jenkins said.

SB144 has already passed the Senate by more than two-thirds' vote — and so is veto-proof there unless some senators change their minds.

The bill is now in the House, where Jenkins said he will start explaining his bill's reasoning to members soon. The bill was amended last Friday to exempt any agreements that cost $50,000 or less.

House Speaker Greg Curtis, R-Sandy, said he has not counted votes in his body. "But we are going to run it and see where it goes." If it becomes a partisan issue, House Republicans have five more votes than needed among themselves to reach two-thirds.

Story continues below
Huntsman, who seeks re-election this year, has been relatively successful in battling such "separation of power" bills before.

Perhaps his largest possible defeat in that area is how the Legislature changed its budget-setting process — adopting base-budget bills early in each session so that lawmakers could adjourn with at least base state government programs funded, if later budget battles with the executive prove unworkable.

"I have no problem with Gov. Huntsman; he's a great guy," Jenkins said. "But what about the next guy" who sits in the governor's office? What if he is not as reasonable as Huntsman?

While denying that Huntsman's climate agreement, made with Schwarzenegger and other Western governors, is not the basis for SB144, Jenkins did say it was that agreement last year that got him and other senators thinking about what kind of interstate agreements a Utah governor could adopt.

"Originally, the senators wanted Senate President John Valentine to sponsor the bill over there and me to sponsor the bill here," Curtis said. But after some thought, it was decided it would be best if Valentine, R-Orem, and Curtis did not appear to be in such a faceoff with Huntsman, since the issue is not personal.

"It is a clear separation of powers issue," Curtis said. "He is obligating us (the Legislature and citizens) to budget for these" agreements without legislative approval.

Recent comments

This is a separation of powers issue. Right now the Legislature is...

Kathy | Feb. 13, 2008 at 10:57 a.m.

Jon Huntsman needs to retire
He has absolutly no idea what is going...

Larry | Feb. 13, 2008 at 1:41 a.m.

The Old Submariner, what your lawyer friends don't grasp is that this...

Respect the Constitution | Feb. 13, 2008 at 12:52 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Letters: Cap medical lawsuits

I lost my 24 yo wife to a negligent doctor. If you could see the inside of a...

Health proposal not 'reform'

Mr. Samuelson, Where were you when Bush and his buddies where spending 2...

Wounded Utes limp home

Thanks for that message...I wish these silly Y and U fans would stop....

We aren't bragging now about our vaunted Yewties... we are humbler Tiggers......

New curriculum focuses on Indians

I'm just wondering when we will stop calling them Indians? Right? I learned...

they're in trouble with Dumb, Dumber and Dumbest in the pipeline. Don't they...

Downtown S.L. thrived for a century

As a kid the downtown was the destination for everyone that lived in the SL...

West Valley teenager shot in leg

The Mayor we just elected has been on the city council for years. No change...

I am surprised that this old joke was deemed "fit to publish." I guess there...

Advertisements
Advertisement