From Deseret News archives:

Law might keep some sick puppies off street

Published: Tuesday, Feb. 12, 2008 12:09 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
This past weekend, my daughter Grace and I visited the dog rescue where we got our pet, Boomer. Boomer needed a good home, and we needed help mending our broken hearts after our dog Casey died. It was a perfect match.

In the kennel, there are rows of dog tags attached to the chain-link fence. They represent hundreds of dogs that have been adopted, which is a triumph. But some of those tags also represent humans who viewed dogs as disposable. You know the type, people who buy a cute puppy for Christmas or someone's birthday without thinking through the decision. Six months later, after the puppy has chewed up mom's handbag or soiled the carpet because no one was home to allow him to relieve himself outside, the puppy isn't so cute any more.

I can't help but think of those dogs as the Utah Legislature debates the issue of animal cruelty. Knowingly torturing or harming an animal is sick and wrong. Chasing a dog with a leaf blower. Sick. Putting the aforementioned dog (who Utahns know as "Henry") in an oven. Wrong. Slashing a neighbor dog's nose through the fence, sick and wrong.

Shooting a 2-month-old puppy? There aren't words.

But there ought to be a law. There ought to be a tough law the first time someone offends like this. They should do some serious time.

Story continues below
If it's not politically palatable to give animals the same degree of protection as humans — such as rendering animal torture a third-degree felony on the first offense — why can't lawmakers entertain the notion of a sentence enhancement?

In general, the law considers animals as property. On a ranch or farm, that makes sense to me. Raising livestock is basically about adding value to a food product for its eventual sale. These are not animals to whom ranchers or farmers become attached in the same way most city dwellers are connected to their companion animals.

Should ranchers torture their animals? Absolutely not. But the further we city dwellers move from our rural roots, the more we lose our sense of what is involved in raising livestock. To the untrained eye, many ranch activities such as branding, docking or castration might appear barbaric. There are some ranchers who fear that things they do in the normal course of business could render them criminal in the eyes of the law.

Recent comments

I agree that pets are the innocent victims of these crimes. I may...

The kid | Feb. 13, 2008 at 11:33 a.m.

I agree that this is a well thought out column that attempts to...

Realist | Feb. 12, 2008 at 1:44 p.m.

Great. Thank your Marjorie. Finally someone that can understand both...

Anonymous | Feb. 12, 2008 at 9:59 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Principal leaves giant imprint

Great job mom. Keep it up. By the way, what exactly is an equivalent?

Miss. teen follows mission

If you had read a little bit, you would see th subject is named Daniel....

I sure hope he's OK. What was he doing going out at 2 am on Black Friday?...

To Marriage and conflicts: While generally I agree with what you said, not...

Temple Square to use LEDs

The jingoistic American who commentated earlier clearly did not read the...

If "druggies" can be inducted into the Hall, then why not a gambler?

Hope it is not serious. Maybe he was on his way to Black Friday Shopping or...

How tragic! Will he be able to play? Will he die? Please tell the Tiger...

Cougs to host Weber St.

WSUfan, do you remember me? Yellow Books something? from a wildcat fan...

It's so wonderful I'm a fan, why can't you all appreciate the wildcats and...

Advertisements