From Deseret News archives:

Lawmakers pledge to tackle campaign-funds expenditures

Published: Tuesday, Feb. 5, 2008 12:26 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Ethics reform in the Utah Legislature historically is not a popular subject — kind of like a skunk at the picnic.

But the "Mainstream/Reagan" House Republican Caucus and a GOP senator believe some steps can be taken this year on several ethical fronts.

Led by Reps. Sheryl Allen, R-Bountiful, and Mel Brown, R-Coalville, the self-styled House Reagan Caucus of 20-or-so less right-wing Republicans in the House want to pass several ethics reform bills this year.

They hope to be joined not only by their more conservative party colleagues, but by House Democrats as well.

"There is a keen interest in doing something with ethics this year," Allen. All 75 House members and half of the 29-member Senate are up for re-election in 2008.

Unknown to each other, the House Republicans and Sen. Greg Bell, R-Fruit Heights, are moving along the same lines, both independently told the Deseret Morning News.

"We want to look at gifts" from lobbyists to legislators, "expenditures of campaign funds" by legislators and whether it is appropriate for "legislators to give campaign contributions from their own accounts to other legislators," said Allen.

Story continues below
She said the Reagan Caucus is considering whether legislators themselves should be responsible for listing which lobbyists give them gifts and the cost of those gifts. Now, lobbyists must file financial reports listing how much they spend on lawmakers.

That is a different approach than Bell's, who still wants lobbyists to report their spending on legislators, but to lower the naming of gift-taking-legislators from the $50 threshold to $15.

Bell has tried variations of ethics reform before, once seeing his gift bill summarily killed by a Senate standing committee after a 10-minute tirade from one Republican senator about how the media mistreats legislators.

"Maybe I'm stupid, but I'm optimistic this year," said Bell.

He wants to make it clear that a legislator or candidate, upon election defeat or retirement from office, can't just give his leftover campaign funds to himself — now a perfectly legal action.

"Between some governors and a few legislators — (outgoing officeholders) have some real dough when they are finished," Bell said. One House leader has more than $330,000 in campaign cash, while a Senate leader has around $130,000 in campaign funds.

Bell's bill will list a range of options where legislators closing out their campaign funds could spend the money — give it to the state, or any political party or PAC, or to any nonprofit entity and so on. Just so long as they didn't give it to themselves.

Recent comments

To tackle campaign-funds expenditures problems and all the gifts and...

Whewww! | Feb. 5, 2008 at 3:10 p.m.

THROW THE BUMS OUT!!!!!!!!!

vern | Feb. 5, 2008 at 10:37 a.m.

Why don't they smell the roses and ban all gifts. If it looks like a...

Ethically challenged | Feb. 5, 2008 at 8:18 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

No, students are NOT safe from predators. If a parent wants to make sure...

If you really think Mormon's are mainstream, you must not have paid attention...

I don't see the schools presidents voting to get rid of WYM or NM, even...

Big games keep UHSAA coffers full

why people complain about how football is covered by the media too much. when...

A little perspective is not a bad thing. Notice the Cougar's won loss record...

I actually was encouraged by some aspects of the game. Any Utah fan who has...

A story about Mormons as minorities? In this paper? Get over the "victim"...

she was an awesome woman someone i looked up to when i was younger she was...

Relieved Cougs prep for Falcons

Wow you just made one of the dumbest comments I've heard yet. Fire Bronco????...

Photos: A Royal welcome home

Re: Huh?, You like many other haters are probably oblivious to many obvious...

Advertisements
Advertisement