Changes sought to allow gay adoptions

Cohabitation rule blocks woman from adopting her partner's 2nd child

Published: Friday, Jan. 25 2008 12:34 a.m. MST

Kim, left, and Ruth Hackford-Peer want Utah law modified so Kim can adopt Casey, whom she's holding, as she did Riley, on couch.

Tim Hussin, Deseret Morning News

Enlarge photo»

Kim Hackford-Peer was by the side of her lesbian partner, Ruth, when both of the couple's two children were born, yet she's only legally a parent to one of them.

Kim was able to adopt Riley, Ruth's biological child, because he was born in Massachusetts where same-sex couples can adopt. But 1-year-old Casey was born in Utah, where they cannot.

It's an issue that lawmakers will consider during the current legislative session. Rep. Rebecca Chavez-Houck, D-Salt Lake, is sponsoring HB318, which would remove a 2000 ban on adoption by cohabitating couples, gay and straight. It would leave in place the current preference for married couples.

Currently, only married couples and singles can adopt or be foster parents in Utah.

The bill will likely face an uphill battle in a state where voters have approved a state constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage and other domestic unions.

Mike Thompson, executive director of Equality Utah, told the Deseret Morning News editorial board Wednesday that adoption and foster care don't violate the marriage amendment because they don't comprise "substantial amount" of marriage rights.

There are an estimated 1,226 children being raised by same-sex couples in Utah, according to a recent report by the Williams Institute at the University of California Los Angeles.

"The state is not going to recognize anything," Thompson said. "These families are already in existence. We're not trying to create a back door."

But Monte Stewart, president of the Marriage Law Foundation, said HB318 would give recognition to gay and straight unmarried couples, even though it doesn't technically violate the marriage amendment.

"That proposed bill is contrary to a fundamental public policy in this state which is that the only legally sanctioned, officially sanctioned, approved sexually based relationship will be married man/woman," Stewart said.

Chavez-Houck said the bill is both common sense and in the children's best interest.

"We say the well-being of children should come first, and that means finding the best home available," she said. "The proposal doesn't detract, but in fact endorses, a home environment with a married mother and father as the first choice. But more and more that option is not available, whether through divorce or other circumstance."

Get The Deseret News Everywhere

Subscribe

Mobile

RSS