From Deseret News archives:

Poisoning in Utah intensifies efforts for a national ban

Published: Tuesday, Jan. 22, 2008 12:21 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Rep. John Salazar, D-Colo., called DeFazio's fears overstated.

A farmer and cattle rancher, Salazar said both pesticides are safe, "environmentally sound tools registered by the Environmental Protection Agency and used only by trained and certified applicators."

Use of the pesticides "is highly target-specific, in limited applications, and in compliance with the regulations of the EPA and local jurisdictions," Salazar wrote in a letter urging colleagues to defeat DeFazio's bill.

Without effective tools to protect them from predators, livestock losses from coyotes and other wildlife could be two to three times higher than current levels — estimated at $16.3 million per year in the sheep industry and $51 million in cattle losses, according to the Colorado Wool Growers Association, which represents the state's 1,600 sheep farms and ranches.

"Regardless of the size of operation, each sheep farm or ranch needs protection against predators, and many operations rely on the assistance and expertise" provided by the Wildlife Services agency, the group said in a letter opposing the ban.

Story continues below
Salazar encouraged colleagues to "stand up for the thousands of livestock producers in our country who provide the world's most abundant food supply and oppose this legislation."

DeFazio said it's unfortunate that the bill's leading opponent is a fellow Democrat and Westerner but said he would push forward with the measure, the latest in a years-long effort to ban the two poisons.

The bill comes as the EPA has taken a long-delayed step toward banning use of the poisons on federal lands. The agency has set a March 5 deadline for public comments on a proposal drafted in response to a petition from a coalition of environmental groups.

The EPA has not reached a decision on the petition and is conducting its own analysis to determine if the pesticides "pose unreasonable adverse effects on the environment," said Dale Kemery, an agency spokesman.

Compound 1080 is made primarily by Alabama-based Tull Chemical Co., while M-44 capsules are produced by the Agriculture Department's Pocatello Supply Depot in Idaho. Warning signs in English and Spanish are required near locations where the poisons are used.

On the Net:

The bill is H.R. 4775. Congress: thomas.loc.gov/

Agriculture Department Wildlife Services Program: www.aphis.usda.gov/wildlife—damage/

Predator Defense: www.predatordefense.org

Recent comments

Poison's are a risk to people, trapping is in humane and dogs can get...

trapper | Jan. 23, 2008 at 8:59 a.m.

The government at its worst. Colossally stupid!

Jerry | Jan. 22, 2008 at 11:28 p.m.

By law, the government places a warning, usually on the fence posts...

CC | Jan. 22, 2008 at 10:57 p.m.

Image
Brooks Fahy, Associated Press

Photo shows a device known as an M-44 designed to spray predators with sodium cyanide. Similar device injured Dennis Slaugh.

previousnext

Latest comments

I too agree that Booz and the team are NOT just going through the motions....

The springs have a long history of being clothing optional, and they provide...

Jazz manage a magical win

He "needs more outside shooting to beat LA". He needs to design a real...

BYU football: NCAA awards

NCFAA Contribution to College Football Award: LaVell Edwards, Brigham Young,...

Why did the Jazz play so bad against LA and really well for a 1/2 against...

Unga might enter NFL draft

We Coug fans will be forever grateful for your three or four years of bearing...

When was the last time Utah even got to the dance three times in a row; let...

His speech was quite good, I agree with what Gingrich said. However, for...

Utah/BYU rivalry can be more civil

I believe that a large part of the deterioration of the rivalry is a result...

Jazz manage a magical win

Good win Jazz!!! Now give Fesenko some Red Bulls and lets see how well the...

Advertisements