From Deseret News archives:

Springville opts against altering border with Sp. Fork

Published: Saturday, Jan. 19, 2008 12:44 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The Springville City Council's vote against a resolution to cede 13 acres to Spanish Fork at Tuesday's council meeting left one man with his property split by the cities' common boundary and no way to continue a development of 407 homes.

Cody Roberts, the man developing the land, was shocked at the council's 4-to-1 vote because it was a reversal of last year's decision.

"The biggest frustration is that (the council) approved the boundary adjustment last February so I moved forward with my plans, but somewhere, somehow, something didn't get finalized," Roberts said. "I don't think what they've done is right."

A few weeks before the council meeting Roberts received a call from Springville's attorney, telling him the boundary line agreement of 2007 was never closed between the cities.

Roberts had already invested more than $220,000 on engineering alone to prepare the 80 acres for construction. He reminded the council of his investment in Tuesday night's meeting.

"I just would really encourage the council to consider moving forward with the same decision as last time because it would really dramatically impact how much time and effort I have spent on engineering, surveying, environmental cleanup and everything that I've done," Roberts said. "I'm very close to making this project completed. This is something that just hit me out of the blue."

Story continues below
The mayor and council members felt differently, saying a change in the southern boundary for Roberts might cause others to ask for a border adjustment.

"I don't see any reason why this should happen and, frankly, I get concerned about the domino effect," said Mayor Gene R. Mangum, in Tuesday's meeting. "One piece of property after another and pretty soon the Spanish Fork boundary is going to be right here on our front door. It's 13 acres of Springville's future that you're asking us to give to Spanish Fork."

This is the first request for a boundary adjustment Springville has received in two years that Councilman Mark Packard can remember, but Packard agreed with the mayor.

"I just think there is a point you have to say this is our border — we're going to stick with our border," said Packard.

Currently Springville has no plans for the land Roberts was developing. Roberts is not sure what course he will pursue in the near future.

Recent comments

Seriously... is the city being serious! "We have to stick to our...

Stupid Stupid City | March 12, 2008 at 8:55 a.m.

WOW! Okay this is just like what happened in Bluffdale city! Can't...

Conspiracy | March 12, 2008 at 8:47 a.m.

I am shocked that Springville City thinks it doesn't have to have any...

concerned citizen | March 12, 2008 at 8:46 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

It is hurting his wife financially for starters,, smokers have much higher...

TCU stuck at fourth in BCS

I agree with AZ BYU fan. TCU is the real deal, just like Utah was last year....

worth a comment

Jazz notes: Young bigs ride bench

Sloan defenders..badely. The big guys could help us in a lot of situations we...

Two teams in the MWC have won the National Championship. Two teams have...

Editorial: Red flags at Fort Hood

I'm LDS, and I'm so ashamed and embarassed by some the comments being posted...

to: at first 3 posters | 8:22 a.m. Nov. 16, 2009 just because barak...

Unfortunately at our latitude in SLC it is IMPOSSIBLE to get enough Vit D...

For those who call Obama a communist, please wake up and stop regurgitating...

Obama seeking a balance in China

so much bitterness so few fact to back it up.

Advertisements
Advertisement