Once again, an Eastern politician has proposed to set aside a vast tract of Western land for the preservation of wilderness. In this case, Rep. Maurice Hinchey of New York wants to designate as wilderness some 9 million acres in southern Utah.
It is all too easy for Easterners and other urban dwellers to assuage their environmental guilt by locking up land in a state far from home. Wilderness is a good thing in proper proportion, but the commitment to wilderness should be shared. I have a modest proposal for Congress: no new wilderness land unless the sponsoring legislators offer up a significant commitment of land from their own state or region. When congressmen start sharing the pain, we'll see how committed they really are to wilderness and the environment.
Steve Fillerup
Payson
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Opinion
- It's déjà vu all over again with...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The pros and...
- Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
- Robert Bennett: How I came to write a weekly...
- George F. Will: A liberal squeeze play to...
- Would repossessing federal lands help fund...
- John Florez: Let's make education's Common...
- Readers' forum: 'Obamacares'
Most Commented
Across Site
In Opinion
- Letter: Lee's financial bungle reflects...
37 - Letter: Obama throws a curveball
31 - It's déjà vu all over again...
30 - Thomas Sowell: Raising taxes on rich...
26 - Letter: Age really matters regarding...
21 - Obama and Romney should speak truth on...
21 - Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
18 - Readers' forum: 'Obamacares'
16






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments