From Deseret News archives:
Lehi's unreasonable charges
How else is one to interpret a new ordinance to charge exorbitant rates for providing public information to the public? From now on, anyone who wants to use the state Government Records Access Management Act to obtain public records from Lehi will have to pay huge hourly rates for the privilege, depending on how high up the request is handled. In the worst case say, a request that involves the highly technical expertise necessary to retrieve e-mails the person making the request would have to pay the rates charged by an IT company with which the city contracts.
The regular rates could be as much as $50 an hour if a department head is involved. It could go as low as $20 per hour if you need someone from just the support staff. By state law, the first 15 minutes are free.
These are not reasonable fees. They seem meant to discourage the public and to keep the city from having to be accountable.
Lehi's city attorney told this newspaper the ordinance came about because of a large number of recent requests for records. He also said it would be unfair for all city taxpayers to bear the burden of retrieving those records.
But, of course, the issue here really isn't about burdens. It's about openness and accountability. We'd like to see the ledger showing the actual costs of fulfilling the recent records requests. It's unlikely these would amount to much per taxpayer.
Newspapers have filled their pages for years with stories about local leaders who have questionable relationships with developers and others, or who misuse funds or otherwise act inappropriately. Easy access to records acts as a backstop to help protect against such things.
Lehi ought to reaffirm its commitment to accountability and lower the fees.
Recent comments
It's a no-brainer that public information is owned by the public and...
Dave | Dec. 22, 2007 at 3:50 a.m.
This is only the beginning, or the continuation of a police state,...
swerl | Dec. 17, 2007 at 11:31 a.m.
I agree completely with Mike (9:48 am).
In fact, most of the data...
Charles H | Dec. 17, 2007 at 10:13 a.m.
- Thanksgiving food for thought 12:03 a.m.
- Weyland writes a 'brave little book' 12:02 a.m.
- 'Vital' birth records, Part 2 12:02 a.m.
- Good is in all kinds of learning 12:02 a.m.
- Today in the Bloggernacle 12:02 a.m.
- Yule essay contest seeking entries 12:01 a.m.
- Wednesday on TV 12:01 a.m.
- Holiday house collects Christmas 12:01 a.m.
- Brazil should use caution 12:01 a.m.
- Sen. Orrin Hatch a friend of Ali's 12:01 a.m.
- Utah, BYU are top choices for bowls
- BYU would like friendlier rivalry
- Protests against Phoenix LDS temple
- Best prep football games of 2009
- KSL: Prostitution in Utah County
- Man trapped in own body for 23 yrs
- Kirilenko climbing blocks list
- Woman describes stabbing, killing
- Boys basketball rankings
- 'Dancing' will fill out finale
- BYU would like friendlier rivalry
229 - Glenn Beck to enter politics?
224 - RSL wins MLS Cup on penalty kicks
202 - Protests against Phoenix LDS temple
189 - Bronco, Kyle rubber match
137 - Palin's book shows she's unqualified
136 - BYU records with win
133 - Letters: Rushing to judge Palin
122 - Hall, Johnson matchup key
102 - Jazz finally win in San Antonio
99
OKC = 16 Jazz = 24. Boozer and Millsap had 10 and Okur had 2. That is...
to To KF 9:35 PM My 42% increase may seem insignificant, but I have a...
Nice........
This is so weird. You see how stacked it is to include Nebraska,simply...
Mike, don't take it so personal. We know you are a Utah homer, but let's get...
I am a Seneca Indian from Western NY and find the meso America theory hard to...
If the chances are slim to none, why is this even news?? Trust the D.N. to...
Realize this. They were sub .500 when they entered the playoffs (not that it...
As a little history lesson - the Michigan team BYU played in 1984 was a very...
If you think Utah is going to do anything in conference you are sorely...

