In his article "Payday-loan bans backfire" (Dec. 8), reporter Lee Davidson cites a "preliminary report by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York" that indicates that residents in two states that have banned payday loans are no better off than before the loans were prohibited. The methodology used in the report is flawed for several reasons, but the most disturbing aspect of Davidson's article is the fact that he attributes the report to the Federal Reserve Bank. If he had taken the trouble to read even part of the report he would have seen that both the cover and the page containing the abstract have clear disclaimers that the report does not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. In preparing this article Davidson has behaved more like a lobbyist for the payday lending business than a professional journalist.
Arthur Sutherland
Sandy
- It's déjà vu all over again with...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The pros and...
- Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
- Robert Bennett: How I came to write a weekly...
- George F. Will: A liberal squeeze play to...
- Would repossessing federal lands help fund...
- Utah Senator Orrin Hatch is a loyal advocate...
- John Florez: Let's make education's Common...
- Letter: Lee's financial bungle reflects...
37 - Letter: Obama throws a curveball
31 - It's déjà vu all over again...
29 - Thomas Sowell: Raising taxes on rich...
26 - Letter: Age really matters regarding...
21 - Obama and Romney should speak truth on...
21 - Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
18 - Would repossessing federal lands help...
13






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments