Today marks one year since attorneys for Wanda Barzee went before the Utah Supreme Court arguing that the decision to allow their client to be forcibly medicated was wrong.
Barzee, 62, and her estranged husband, co-defendant Brian David Mitchell, are accused of kidnapping Elizabeth Smart in 2002. Three times she has been ruled incompetent to stand trial. Doctors at the Utah State Hospital say they have tried everything to restore her competency except anti-psychotic medication, which she refuses to take.
On June 21, 2006, 3rd District Judge Judith Atherton ruled Barzee met the four criteria set in Sell v. United States and could be forcibly medicated. Barzee's defense team quickly filed an appeal with the state's high court, which agreed to hear the case on Dec. 6, 2006. Attorney Scott Williams argued that Atherton's decision was not supported by the evidence presented in court.
One year later, the Utah Supreme Court has yet to issue a decision.
"Yeah, we're surprised," Williams said. "We were asked by the court on an expedited basis (to present arguments). We expedited the proceedings, we expedited the argument and we haven't heard on an issue that those involved thought was (an immediate issue)."
The Salt Lake District Attorney's Office said it would withhold comment until the justices made a decision.
But legal expert and former Brigham Young University law professor Marguerite Driessen, who has no direct involvement with the case, said she, too, is a little puzzled by how much time has passed without a decision.
"It's kind of funny to me that they've taken so long," she said. "Clearly, forced medication is a somewhat sensitive issue. But typically I would not expect this to take so long."
By comparison, it would not be unusual for a capital murder case or a case before the U.S. Supreme Court to take a year, Driessen said.
Ed Smart, Elizabeth's father, said he was surprised at how long the cases for both Barzee and Mitchell have taken.
"It's amazing. I would never have guessed in a million years it would take this long," he said. "It seems every right of the predators is being given to them. What's Elizabeth's right to have them put away? Victims' rights ... are there any? But they aren't hurting her at this point, and we're moving ahead.
"The courts will do whatever they're going to do. I just can't believe it can drag on forever."
- Dangerous silence: Why you need to talk to...
- Identities released in St. George fatal plane...
- Holiday campers surprised by canyon snowfall
- Four killed in plane crash near St. George...
- West Jordan teen releases 5th iPhone app
- Several Utah high schools moving to 4-year...
- Is this dress too short? Tooele teen gets...
- Impact of dam flooding to be tested
- Is this dress too short? Tooele teen...
57 - Billboard battle heats up as company...
29 - Studies try to find why poorer people...
24 - Sarah Palin catches flak over her Orrin...
24 - Liljenquist pushing to make name for...
21 - How will Palin endorsement affect Hatch...
20 - Dangerous silence: Why you need to talk...
19 - Romney's veepstakes: Buzz builds around...
18







DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments