From Deseret News archives:

The cross gets a reprieve

Published: Friday, Nov. 23, 2007 12:09 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
To quote from Paul Simon, "The cross is in the ballpark." U.S. District Judge David Sam has ruled that posting a cross to memorialize a fallen Highway Patrol trooper does not violate the U.S. Constitution.

His reasoning — that sometimes religious symbols become secular symbols — is sound and filled with common sense. One can imagine it applied in other areas. For a child to be hoisted by Santa Claus does not mean the child is being taught to rely on the intervention of St. Nicholas. Space and time have created a certain disconnect between the two things.

Still, the cross became a lightning rod in the Highway Patrol case for a reason. It was an excuse, in ways, for deeper concerns.

Some people see the United States as a Christian nation and Christian principles should be the norm. Many of them would likely like to see schoolchildren go back to eating fish on Fridays and let teachers make students memorize the Lord's Prayer. The problem with that, of course, is that forcing Jewish or Muslim children to memorize Christian prayers is unfair on the face of it. Mutual respect and understanding should rule. And when religious issues arise, they should be dealt with on a case-by-case basis.

Story continues below
On the other side, it's no secret that those fighting to have the crosses removed are not all high-minded constitutional purists. Many have an ax to grind when it comes to religion and, knowing that big issues — like getting the phrase "In God We Trust" chipped off the money — are too much of a challenge, they choose to fight skirmishes and firefights on the edges, hoping a victory here and there will weaken the role of religion in America. They are crusaders as much as the early Christians, with all the ugly short-sightedness and prejudice as their Christian counterparts centuries ago.

In the end, Judge Sam was right. Christian symbols do morph into cultural symbols at times. But that doesn't mean Christians should crow and the non-religious should pout. It means Americans must be careful when such cases arise to treat each one with seriousness and common sense, just as Judge Sam has done with the troopers and the cross.

Recent comments

The judge was wrong; a religious symbol is a religious symbol and...

Monty Gaither | Nov. 24, 2007 at 10:56 a.m.

well, if any of the fallen are Jewish, perhaps we can put a star of...

my2cents | Nov. 24, 2007 at 8:57 a.m.

Biblically, you have two dominions. You have the material and the...

Anonymous | Nov. 23, 2007 at 10:42 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

TCU creams U.

Congratulations to TCU! You are a deserving team and maybe the best team in...

Bennett has broken this solemn oath to only serve 2 terms - Why would you...

TCU stays 4th in AP; Y. 19th, U. 23rd

has been restored TCU > BYU > Utah AP/Coaches #4/#4 TCU #19/#18 BYU ...

TCU creams U.

I'm not stu-pid like Bob2. Both teams got destroyed by TCU. Different...

5A: Davis runs over Hunter

Hinds will run over 100 yards on Friday and it will be a good game. Bingham...

Hugh Nibley's coded language

I would suppose that only an African American Latterday Saint would be...

Summits are the tops of mountains and pretentious meetings of those who are...

Presidential summits look good

I would put the selection on my resume! Of course, like, Ann McFetters...

Utes exposed

How condescending is that? Throughout Urban Meyer's 2 years, Cougar fan...

Love ya, Tom. You are so right.

Advertisements
Advertisement