From Deseret News archives:

The cross gets a reprieve

Published: Friday, Nov. 23, 2007 12:09 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
To quote from Paul Simon, "The cross is in the ballpark." U.S. District Judge David Sam has ruled that posting a cross to memorialize a fallen Highway Patrol trooper does not violate the U.S. Constitution.

His reasoning — that sometimes religious symbols become secular symbols — is sound and filled with common sense. One can imagine it applied in other areas. For a child to be hoisted by Santa Claus does not mean the child is being taught to rely on the intervention of St. Nicholas. Space and time have created a certain disconnect between the two things.

Still, the cross became a lightning rod in the Highway Patrol case for a reason. It was an excuse, in ways, for deeper concerns.

Some people see the United States as a Christian nation and Christian principles should be the norm. Many of them would likely like to see schoolchildren go back to eating fish on Fridays and let teachers make students memorize the Lord's Prayer. The problem with that, of course, is that forcing Jewish or Muslim children to memorize Christian prayers is unfair on the face of it. Mutual respect and understanding should rule. And when religious issues arise, they should be dealt with on a case-by-case basis.

Story continues below
On the other side, it's no secret that those fighting to have the crosses removed are not all high-minded constitutional purists. Many have an ax to grind when it comes to religion and, knowing that big issues — like getting the phrase "In God We Trust" chipped off the money — are too much of a challenge, they choose to fight skirmishes and firefights on the edges, hoping a victory here and there will weaken the role of religion in America. They are crusaders as much as the early Christians, with all the ugly short-sightedness and prejudice as their Christian counterparts centuries ago.

In the end, Judge Sam was right. Christian symbols do morph into cultural symbols at times. But that doesn't mean Christians should crow and the non-religious should pout. It means Americans must be careful when such cases arise to treat each one with seriousness and common sense, just as Judge Sam has done with the troopers and the cross.

Recent comments

The judge was wrong; a religious symbol is a religious symbol and...

Monty Gaither | Nov. 24, 2007 at 10:56 a.m.

well, if any of the fallen are Jewish, perhaps we can put a star of...

my2cents | Nov. 24, 2007 at 8:57 a.m.

Biblically, you have two dominions. You have the material and the...

Anonymous | Nov. 23, 2007 at 10:42 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

RSL regroups, dominates 2nd half

Amazingly grueling game. 120 min. . . + PKs. . .on turf. . .when both teams...

Real Champions

From Miami FL to Utah, enjoy it! I'm glad you defeated those LA fakers. This...

Eric, Government health care doesn't have to worry about turning a profit...

Broncos make Aggies pay

"I was at the game last night and I was unimpressed. My wife and I were...

Conversations about religion are okay - telling people who are not members of...

Excellent letter... While Sarah Palin is not necessarily my candidate of...

The whole show should have been rated R. It was disgusting. The American Idol...

If you don't like the parade, don't watch it! And the gays show no more...

Are parents and government that naive to think or expect day care to mean...

Spoken like a true Orwellian. Evil is good and good is evil. How is...

Advertisements