From Deseret News archives:

Water conservation a safe bet for Vegas

Report urges making changes, avoid pipeline plan

Published: Friday, Nov. 16, 2007 12:12 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Las Vegas could save rivers' worth of water, but instead it is falling behind other Western cities in water conservation, according to a report from two conservation groups.

According to Steve Erickson of the Salt Lake-based Citizens Education Project, the findings call into question plans to pipe underground water from the Nevada-Utah border to the Las Vegas area. Conservationists and ranchers claim the water table could drop drastically, harming resources on both sides of the state boundary.

The report, "Hidden Oasis: Water Conservation and Efficiency in Las Vegas," was prepared by the Pacific Institute in Oakland, Calif., and Western Resource Advocates of Boulder, Colo.

The report concludes that "installing water-efficient fixtures and appliances could reduce current indoor water demand by 40 percent in single-family homes and nearly 30 percent in hotels and casinos."

If water-efficient landscapes were installed throughout the Las Vegas area, that could reduce the present outdoor water demand by 40 percent in single-family homes, the report adds.

Story continues below
"Many of these efficiency improvements can be implemented at a lower cost and with fewer social and environmental impacts than developing new water supplies," the report said. The entire report is available on the Web at pacinst.org/reports/las_vegas.

The report concludes that with the right steps, the Las Vegas area could save 86,000 acre-feet of water per year.

"We basically do science and analysis for policy purposes," said Peter H. Gleick, co-founder and president of the Pacific Institute. "We looked at the way Las Vegas uses water and their potential to reduce inefficient and wasteful uses of water."

Heather Cooley, senior research associate at the institute, said the potential water saving from homes, hotels and casinos "was equivalent to about 80,000 to 90,000 acre-feet a year."

That is a significant savings and was based on technological changes such as switching to front-end-loading clothes washers, using water-saving toilets and modern shower heads. "We looked at installing the appliances and fixtures that meet current national standards," she said.

According to Bart Miller of Western Resource Advocates, the water authority indicated "they're spending 14 times as much money in seeking out new supplies than they're spending on conservation." About 90 percent of the authority's conservation spending is on an outdoor turf replacement program, he added.

Recent comments

The Southern Nevada Water Authority can not forecast water usage or...

Daniel Jarvis | Jan. 2, 2008 at 10:54 a.m.

This is an excellent eye opening report that highlights the...

Gerald McDonough | Nov. 16, 2007 at 12:38 p.m.

The concern with current SNWA leadership TRUST.

SNWA General...

Terry Marasco | Nov. 16, 2007 at 10:12 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Sarah Palin a "seed needed to grow"... are you kidding me? I guess...

I remember watching a program where they took scans and photos of the shroud...

I have just the solution. The Free Market! Those who think that the sky is...

Mitchell's attorneys file to withdraw

"which contains information that could be used for impeachment purposes,"...

Expect epic clash on the line

Against Oklahoma were his own fault. Three count em three. He is a poor...

Editorial: Hold the line on taxes

I am a true Utah County Republican/Libertarian. Any tax is too much for me....

How the heck can you incarcerate a man for growing the very plant the US...

Just as Scott McClellan's sudden realization of the Bush administrations...

BYU records with win

The only way to know which team is better is for them to play each other.

Jason is the best thing to happen to Washington D.C. Thanks for the...

Advertisements