From Deseret News archives:

Coverage of protests hurts firms, Cornell-Y. study says

Number of participants is not major factor in damage

Published: Tuesday, Nov. 13, 2007 12:13 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
A protest need not be a huge affair to have an impact on a company's bottom line, according to a new study co-authored by a Brigham Young University professor.

In fact, the analysis of nearly 30 years of protests found that what matters most is not the number of sign-waving participants but the amount of media coverage the event received.

Of the 342 protests covered by the New York Times between 1962 and 1990, stock prices of the targeted companies fell one-tenth of a percent for every paragraph printed about the event, the analysis concluded.

"We find that the size of the protest actually doesn't matter at all," said lead author Brayden King, an assistant professor of sociology at BYU. "You can have a very small protest with a lot of media coverage and do more damage to the company's image than a large protest with a lot of participants."

The study, which will soon be published in the academic journal Administrative Science Quarterly, found that protests caused an average decline in stock prices between 0.4 percent and 1 percent. The drops usually took place on the day of the protest or the day after, and prices tended to return to expected levels about five days after the event.

Story continues below
"It's a fairly quick decline, but even that kind of a quick decline can lead to a noticeable loss of investment capital," said King, whose co-author was Sarah Soule of Cornell University.

The dip in stock prices can happen for a number of reasons, including fears that the media coverage will hurt the targeted company's brand image or reputation.

"Fundamentally, investors react negatively to some sort of announcement or event because there is a fear or perception that there will be a decline in the net present value in the company," he said.

Sometimes, however, the impact is more long-lasting. A very public 1992 protest after Cracker Barrel instituted a formal policy against hiring homosexual employees resulted in a 26 percent drop in stock prices against the restaurant chain, the study notes.

"One message that comes from this is the guy on the street can exert some power and influence on big corporations," King said. "The key thing here is finding an ally in the media."


E-mail: awelling@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

I Call BS. The line "We have decades of history of women trying to engineer...

By the two rooks playing well the past few games, will not impact Sloan one...

President Obama believes that criticism makes him a better leader??? Wow...

1A and 2A sports is awesome! You have to be raised and have roots in these...

are kidding, trap game, I pitty the Aztecs however I fear them more than I do...

To "nobel | 3:51 p.m." wow, what a rant. This country is being destroyed by...

Editorial: Red flags at Fort Hood

Greetings: Jesus Christ taught that "by their fruits, ye shall know them."...

Both Utah and BYU will be 9-2 entering the 11/28 game. BYU rarely struggles...

TCu is great, Utah and BYU are good!! Both got worked by the frogs. NO...

UNLV coach fired after 5 seasons

It's sad that your grasping at such weak points to defend your program Down...

Advertisements
Advertisement