From Deseret News archives:

Terminated members of Ute Tribe dispute time limits on claims

Published: Tuesday, Nov. 6, 2007 12:07 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
An attorney for terminated members of the Ute Indian Tribe says that a federal statute preserves the claims of his 650 clients, despite the federal government's insistence that they have run out of time to fight a 59-year-old mandate that removed their names from the tribe's membership rolls.

Dennis Chappabitty, an Indian-rights attorney from Sacramento, Calif., says a law passed by Congress three years ago proves the statute of limitations hasn't even begun to run for lead plaintiffs Oranna Felter of Roosevelt, Cal Hackford of Whiterocks and hundreds of other terminated Uinta Band members and their descendants.

In 1954, the Ute Partition Act removed the names of 490 Uintas with less than 50 percent Ute blood from tribal rolls. The majority of them were children. Felter was 10 years old at the time

Chappabitty's latest legal brief says the court must recognize that federal law bars the statute of limitations "from running on any claim, including any claim in litigation pending on the date of enactment" of the 2004 Department of Interior statute.

The rule allows time for affected tribes or individual Indians to be furnished with an accounting of funds so they can determine whether there has been a loss.

His clients have yet to receive any such accounting from the federal government, said Chappabitty, adding the money they are owed could be in the multi-millions of dollars.

Story continues below
The terminated members of the Uinta band in 2002 filed in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., to have the Ute Partition Act declared invalid. Felter has successfully fought in court for her hunting and fishing rights, but the case filed by Chappabitty five years ago was their first attempt to have the act overturned that had ended their tribal identity.

Federal Judge Richard W. Roberts dismissed their case last year on the grounds that the statute of limitations expired in 1967. However, an appellate court this past January reversed Roberts' ruling.

The appeals court ordered him to consider whether the terminated Uintas had access to their financial records and receive an accounting of what had transpired before ruling that the statute of limitations had run its course in the case.

In 1950, the federal Court of Claims handed down a $32 million "judgment" on behalf of the Ute Indian Tribe. In Chappabitty's recent brief before the court, he noted that the Court of Claims funds were ordered paid to the tribe at a time when his clients "were federally recognized members of the Uintah Band of Ute Indians."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Protests against Phoenix LDS temple

This is just more of the same bigotry that raises its ugly head every time...

Obama to honor young inventors

I never knew Obama was a sience nerd. You learn something new each day...

legal worker cards ... he meant work authorization cards... this is not a...

That does it, I'm moving to Portland and opening a TacoBell / Pizza Hut...

I don't care who is taxed. I just resent the fact that the legislators are...

Hunter vs. Lone Peak game was truly epic and the best Utah prep game in years...

Boys basketball rankings

Dear Ted... K before you go talkin smack on 2A look at your rankings first :]

Girls basketball rankings

Whipped Panguitch pretty handily over the weekend and is not even in the top 5?

Respect. Your post smacks of disrespect. Just your sarcasm is exactly...

Ask the people in Draper and South Jordon how they feel about the temple,...

Advertisements