From Deseret News archives:

West Jordan councilman returns campaign donation

Published: Sunday, Nov. 4, 2007 12:08 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
In the aftermath of being accused of selling his vote, one West Jordan city councilman has decided to return a controversial $1,500 campaign donation.

In a letter to Peterson Development on Saturday, Rob Bennett apologized to the company for asking for a donation while the company had projects in process with the city and for any appearance of impropriety the donation may have caused.

"I absolutely affirm there was no intent of my ever voting differently in regards to your projects or any other, whether you donated to my campaign or not," Bennett told the company in a letter. "To avoid the appearance of evil and to preserve the good name of your company as well as my own, I am returning your campaign donation."

Bennett and City Councilman Mike Kellermeyer — who are both up for re-election — have each come under fire in the few remaining days before Tuesday's election for accepting a $1,500 contribution from the Peterson Development Co. The two men accepted the contributions shortly before voting to increase the density of a proposed Peterson project.

Both Bennett and Kellermeyer have a reputation in the community for generally opposing high-density projects, and their votes represent an about-face to some residents and members of the council.

Story continues below
"It reflects badly on the entire council," Councilwoman Melissa Johnson said. "It reflects badly on the city, and I believe it gives developers the idea that in order for a project to be approved, you need to contribute to a council member's campaign. I think it gives residents the idea that developers can put any density they want wherever they want if they're willing to pay the council to get it."

Johnson says she doesn't think giving the money back will change some residents' negative view of Bennett. "I personally don't think there's a lot either of them can do to change their perception," Johnson said.

Bennett and Kellermeyer emphatically deny that accepting the contribution had any effect on their votes, and according to Kellermeyer, the negative publicity is a well-timed stunt to tarnish Bennett's campaign — with Kellermeyer as collateral damage.

"My vote was not inconsistent with my voting patterns," Kellermeyer said. "I've voted for high density where I feel it makes sense. I fight high density in some places, but this particular project ... addressed quite a few things, and I felt like it was a deserving project."

Recent comments

It is even worse than the article suggests. The property that Ivory...

Jeremy | Nov. 6, 2007 at 3:21 p.m.

Too late. We will be voting Lems.

Sugar Factory Family | Nov. 4, 2007 at 9:24 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

"Price has been problematic for proponents of the exchange who have been...

By the way: Legacy Highway was the suggested alternative to hwy 89.

..but, unfortunately, it sells papers because people want in on the gossip.

Peanuts are NOT NUTS. They are legumes, like beans are. I am allergic to tree...

Mosiah 4: 16-18: So tell me at what point did Mosiah say give of you...

Cougars O-line a strength

Now take advantage of their size and strength and run the ball more --...

Kim Shinkoskey...I'm afraid your the one who lost his mind.

Is Tiger Woods a sex addict?

It seems to me that if Tiger is going to be about fixing his problem the...

Well said...

Spoken like someone truly out of touch with reality. You now want us to...

Advertisements