From Deseret News archives:

DNA claims rebutted on Book of Mormon

Published: Tuesday, Oct. 23, 2007 12:21 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Yet Gardner said that response can be attributed to what he called "the 'CSI' effect," referring to the popular TV series that depicts forensic scientists solving complicated questions about crime scenes using DNA evidence. Based on those fictional depictions, "One of the things we all know is that DNA proves pretty much everything," when in reality, there are major limitations on what it can define about family lineage.

Because most genetic mapping is done through mitochondrial DNA, which tracks only the female line, Gardner said the category of people excluded from being linked to a living person by genetic testing going back several generations is huge. "Most tests trace only a few of a person's ancestors and a small portion of their DNA."

He also referred to what is known to researchers as a "genetic bottleneck," where "only a few people survive" some major cataclysmic event "and we end up with only the DNA of the survivors and not the rest of the population. It's entirely possible other people were here that had different DNA, and we can't find it because they never made it through the 'bottleneck event."'

DNA tests also may report false positives or false negatives, he said, and there are many historical scenarios where physical evidence of things that are known to have occurred doesn't match what researchers expected to find using DNA evidence.

Story continues below
Latter-day Saint scientists never have disputed the movement of large groups of people from Asia to the Americas, he said, though many LDS members have grown up believing that the only people who ever migrated to the Americas descended from Lehi's family in the Book of Mormon.

"We're often trying to compare our traditions versus science, but what does the Book of Mormon actually say? ... No matter how many opinions someone might have about the Book of Mormon, if the opinion is wrong, it's the opinion that's wrong and not the book," Gardner said.

"What we know today about the Book of Mormon is more right than what we knew 10 years ago, and what we knew 10 years ago had some misconceptions. Our opinions will continue to change in the future, but that doesn't change the truthfulness of the book."

The daylong conference explored a variety of topics, including Chiasmus and other aspects related to in-depth study of the Book of Mormon. The annual event is sponsored by the Book of Mormon Archaeological Forum. For information, go to www.bmaf.org.


E-mail: carrie@desnews.com

Recent comments

Evidence like this is not what gives you a testamony against or for...

Elias | Sept. 22, 2008 at 10:54 a.m.

"The basics prove it"?
Then start eating your friskies now.
I can...

James | March 29, 2008 at 1:04 p.m.

If anybody can duplicate a work like the BOM then I would eat cat...

The basics prove it | Jan. 6, 2008 at 11:08 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Religion in politics is tiresome

Pagan | 1:45 p.m. Martin Luther King was a Republican. Go ahead... google...

i don't believe the story about the beer. not at all, not one bit. i won't...

re: Moral values in both parties | 2:06 p.m. Nov. 30, 2009 //Take a look...

This stuff is all idiotic. This woman's father (MITCHELL) is NO PROPHET! I am...

Hall reprimanded by MWC

Why? Because he dishonored the entire program by his tirade and went against...

Religion in politics is tiresome

Christy, You answered your own question. You made Mr. Obama god. You...

Notre Dame fires Weis

Its never too late to come back west. BYU still has a scholarship waiting for...

There seems to be a common misconception that insanity equally affects all of...

Understanding translation process

Very interesting article. I wonder if we will start to see a shift in how...

Utes won't respond to Hall

The picture of coach Whittingham's daughter sheds a thousand words......

Advertisements