From Deseret News archives:

Utah's proposed voucher law subverts our American values

Published: Saturday, Oct. 20, 2007 12:09 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
School vouchers are un-American. Vouchers are anti-America. Utah's voucher law subverts American values.

America is a great nation — not because we create good men and women but because we believe all men and women are good. "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal. ..." The genius of America is not that our people are different but that our people are more like all other people than any nation's people have ever been.

America invented universal public education to celebrate our similarities, to honor the human in all of us. All men and women, no matter who they are or how much they know, can teach us something.

The purpose of education is to help find the goodness in each of us ... and in all of us together. The purpose of education is not to make us good business leaders, good physicians, good parents or good citizens. The purpose of education is to make us good. Period. American ideals hold that all meaningful personal and social skills are built upon a foundation of goodness.

Story continues below
You cannot develop goodness — the most American of all characteristics — if you separate yourself from others. Vouchers build walls instead of bridges. We can and should tolerate people of privilege — those who isolate themselves from the rest of us, live in gated communities, send their children to gated schools, work in gated surroundings. But they do themselves, their children and their society a disservice. We should tolerate privilege, but we should not glorify it.

The voucher movement is driven by anti-social values. If we use public money to support that movement, it will destroy us. And if we make anti-social values socially, politically and economically desirable, we will commit national suicide.

Growth and happiness come from climbing the mountain, not from standing at the top.

Proponents say vouchers will generate more money for public education. Anyone who believes that is not only selfish but naive. Proponents say vouchers will bring competition. That's like telling a football coach: "Give us your 10 best players, their scholarship money and their support systems, and it will make your team better."

Public education can afford to lose a few good students, but it cannot afford to lose their support systems — parents who have the interest, resources and power to change education. They think of themselves as caring parents. If they were both good citizens and good parents, they would focus their influence on improving public schools.

Recent comments

I think Gale has mixed up the role of religion and education....

Rich | Oct. 25, 2007 at 8:04 a.m.

The reality is that I do not want my tax dollars going to private...

The reality is... | Oct. 22, 2007 at 2:15 p.m.

Thank you Don Gale! You have articulated so well what I have felt...

Barbara | Oct. 22, 2007 at 9:00 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

When Boozer was shooting the free throws, why Sloan didn't substitute Mathew...

Letters: Global warming a lie

actions, I will be forced to be accountable for them. I refuse. I am an...

What's with the Utah fans flashing the double L sign?

@mark: So Sam da Ham... you were just making it up?" I'm a climate...

Utes excited to go to San Diego

"I have no idea why BYU fans are talking smack about bowl opponents. Even if...

TCU versus BSU unpopular

You say to "quit whining and play somebody." Isn't that what everyone is...

BoM translation remarkably consistent

Reading these comments, I start wondering-- Whatever happened to faith? Why...

Utes excited to go to San Diego

All those numbers when all you reall need to know is that BYU has beat Utah...

BYU eager for crack at Oregon State

All thos numbers when all you reall need to know is that BYU has beat Utah...

So Sam da Ham, when you said this: "Not so. Al Gore is poised to make...

Advertisements