From Deseret News archives:

Troubling conflicts of interest

Published: Friday, Oct. 19, 2007 12:24 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
State Reps. Aaron Tilton, R-Springville, and Mike Noel, R-Kanab, have huge conflicts of interest when it comes to potential laws that could benefit the construction of a nuclear power plant in Utah. That is so clear that it would be difficult to imagine a reasonable observer concluding otherwise, even if both men steadfastly deny it.

Tilton is an owner of Transition Power Development, a private equity group that wants to secure water rights for a nuclear power plant in Utah. Noel is executive director of the Kane County Water Conservancy District, which would supply the water for such a plant. Noel chairs the Legislature's Public Utilities and Technology Committee, which is considering nuclear power in Utah as well as possible public involvement, and Tilton is the vice chairman.

These conflicts were brought to light by a report earlier this week in this newspaper. Absent that, the public would not likely have known about it. In a state that correctly values the virtues of a part-time citizen Legislature, it is normal to expect that conflicts will arise. The trade-off is that citizens will be represented by people who are not merely close to their constituents but who work and live among them. Utah lawmakers are not full-time politicians who can isolate themselves year-round in Salt Lake City.

Story continues below
But that doesn't lessen the concerns that conflicts of interest can bring to public governance. The Legislature's own rules on this are stunningly lax. They forbid lawmakers from abstaining during votes, regardless of their conflicts. They have to declare conflicts, no more. But even that requirement seems to be difficult for some.

Let's be frank about Tilton and Noel's claims they have no conflicts of interest in this case. Both are trying to split hairs with a dull knife. Tilton says he's not a regulated utility, which makes his involvement in committee hearings on this matter no conflict. But he stands to make a lot of money if a nuclear plant is built. Noel says he won't make any money. His water district job pays him a salary, and that won't change. But landing a contract to provide water for a plant would reflect nicely on his job performance. Conflicts don't always have to be directly financial.

This page leans toward support for nuclear power in Utah. It appears to be the best option for clean energy in an environment threatened by global warming.

Under the rules, Tilton and Noel should declare their conflicts, nothing more. But frankly, those rules need to be tightened considerably.

Recent comments

You end your very good editorial with the suggestion that the rules...

Joe Watts | Oct. 21, 2007 at 8:23 a.m.

This is a lot to do about nothing. First these guys will probably go...

Stewart | Oct. 19, 2007 at 1:30 p.m.

Hey 'I agree,' it would seem you posted on the other article...

James | Oct. 19, 2007 at 9:32 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Editorial: No hurry on lake bridge

Timj, so why do people still commute between Salt Lake and Utah counties?...

And your fears are well founded. Thankfully the dark days that are fast...

Wise beyond your years you are young Jedi.

Could not agree more. I don't know what it is about him, but I feel nauseous...

I lived in the Eagle Mountain Ranches and near the nutty putty caves for many...

If Ruud comes to RSL I'll be buying season tickets. The one thing RSL is...

I forgot Frank, who was the President who started the nation building in...

Letters: C02 causes warming

Please tell me this is sarcasm.

I've spent much time in the temples. That time has inspired me to improve...

Boys basketball rankings

Tabby, Duchesne, and Rich will all challenge the powers from down south. Also...

Advertisements