From Deseret News archives:

Despite what rules say, conflict of interest clear

Published: Friday, Oct. 19, 2007 12:24 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
This past week, Utahns got a clear look at what is increasingly becoming a sensitive issue in the state Legislature: conflicts of interest among the 104 part-time lawmakers.

This newspaper broke the story locally of two lawmakers who have clear dealings with an attempt to build a nuclear-powered electrical generation plant in Utah.

Yet both men did not publicly disclose those efforts, even though one co-chairs an interim study committee that is holding nuclear power hearings and the other sits on that committee.

And both men steadfastly maintain that they did not break any legislative conflict of interest rules.

The public brouhaha that has erupted in Capitol hallways is leaving both citizens and other legislators shaking their heads, all saying the same thing: If this is not a conflict of interest under legislative rules, then clearly legislative rules are ineffective on conflicts of interest.

While many may agree that conflict of interest rules may be ineffective — not only for Reps. Mike Noel, R-Kanab, and Aaron Tilton, R-Springville, but for every other legislator — don't hold your breath on any rule changes.

When confronted with clear conflicts of interests, legislators have a standard response: circle the wagons, deny there is a conflict, blame the media and move on.

Story continues below
Move on to more conflicts of interests, more distrust of lawmakers and the legislative process.

I'll let you decide if there are conflicts for Noel and Tilton.

Quick facts: Tilton, whose private job is consulting on energy producing projects, like coal-fired electrical plants, in February started a new firm, Transition Power Development LLC. Its goal is to get a new nuclear power plant licensed in Utah (location not yet decided). He and his partners (he names one, but refuses to say who is backing the project financially) would then sell that license to an entity that would actually build the $3 billion plant. Tilton didn't amend his written conflict of interest form listing TPD until last week.

Noel is an environmental consultant and director of the Kane County Water Conservancy District.

Tilton's TPD recently signed an agreement with the water district, making a $10,000 down payment, to buy up to 30,000 acre feet of water each year for the nuclear plant. It is planned that TPD will pay the district $100,000 a year for five years, then $500,000 a year until the plant comes online, and then $1 million a year after that for water.

Recent comments

This is clearly a conflict of interest, I do not know the process or...

sosueme534 | Oct. 23, 2007 at 6:11 a.m.

Thanks Bob.

A free, unfettered press with good, honest reporters...

Joe Watts | Oct. 21, 2007 at 8:30 a.m.

We have the same situation brewing in Sevier County. There, a 270Mw...

Michael | Oct. 20, 2007 at 7:52 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

KM, no, we told the enemy that we are going to kill a lot of them in the next...

I'll take the health care plan that Congress now currently has...$500.00 a...

Why is there no mention of how the wife is? The article states that she was...

Utahns in giving mood

I am glad that people gave so good to the Utah Food bank this year, Their...

As an Atheist Merry Christmas doesn't offend me *Roll-Eyes* what offends me...

"We could win this war in record time with overwhelming force, but,...

I don't need to read anything but the title of the article to know that its...

Man fueling holocausts in nature

does that mean I have to change my behavior? Arrrghhhh! Jeff is an evil...

Another BCS mess

Yesterday was about 0:37 seconds from disaster. As the poster from 1:08 PM...

Its Utah drivers they mostly all drive too fast it doesn't matter what...

Advertisements