From Deseret News archives:
U. to study proposed affiliation with Dixie
The U.'s Board of Trustees voted to move ahead with a study of Dixie's proposal to affiliate with the U. — not agreeing to it, but agreeing to consider it. The plan ultimately would extend the U.'s affiliation with the St. George community college, while allowing each institution to keep its current mission.
"We feel a responsibility as the premier educational institution in the state to work together to build the whole system, and if this is a way in which that can be done, in the long run we will all benefit as there are more qualified students available in the state and more workers for high-end jobs and so forth," said U. President Michael K. Young.
Dixie's Board of Trustees extended a formal invitation to the U. to explore the affiliation following their meeting Oct. 2. The proposal includes a name change to the "University of Utah, St. George," an idea that doesn't sit well with many alumni.
"I am personally quite disappointed in changing the name," said Scott Lovell, who graduated from Dixie College in 1984 and now serves as a member of the Dixie Foundation Board. "There has been a lot of opposition voiced to a name change."
A petition with signatures of more than 500 donors, residents and Dixie alumni opposing the change was provided to the U.'s Board of Trustees, said John Blake, president of the northern Utah chapter of the Dixie State College of Utah Alumni Association.
"If this proposal is done correctly, it's going to be a great benefit to the college and community," said Blake, who attended Monday's meeting at the U. "But we have to draw a line here. We don't want to lose our identity, our pioneer heritage, all in the interest of political correctness. It was very clear today that the University of Utah has taken no position on the name and see it strictly as a local, community issue."
The proposal is still in the early stages of consideration and certain details must be worked out before the option is ready to be presented to the Board of Regents and state lawmakers.
Young said infrastructure issues, such as information technology, library systems, registration and curriculum offerings, as well as the needs of students and the community and faculty resources, need to be looked into.
"You name it, we're going to study it," said Young.
He expects the study, conducted by a task force made up from officials at both schools, to take at least five months to a year to complete.
"We will take as long as necessary to get it right," he said, adding that the study will reveal what needs to be done and in what order.
