WASHINGTON Fifty years ago this week, America was shaken out of technological complacency by a beeping 180-pound aluminum ball orbiting overhead. Sputnik was a shock because we had always assumed that Russia was nothing but a big, lumbering and all-brawn bear. He could wear down the Nazis and produce mountains of steel but had none of our savvy or sophistication. Then one day we wake up, and he beats us into space, placing overhead the first satellite to orbit the Earth since God placed the moon where it could give us lovely sailing tides.
At the time, all thoughts were about the Soviets overwhelming us technologically. But the panic turned out to be unwarranted. Sputnik was not subtle science. The Soviets were making up for their inability to miniaturize nuclear warheads something that does require sophistication by developing massive rockets. And they had managed to develop one just massive enough to hurl a ball into Earth's orbit.
We had no idea how lucky we were with Sputnik. The subsequent panic turned out to be an enormous boon. The fear of falling behind the communists induced the federal government to pour a river of money into science and math education. The result was a generation of scientists who gave us not only Apollo and the moon, but the sinews of the information age for example, ARPA that created ARPANET that became the Internet that has assured American technological dominance to this day.
There was another lucky outcome of Sputnik. Two years earlier, President Dwight D. Eisenhower had proposed "Open Skies" under which the United States and Russia would permit spy-plane overflights so each would know the other's military capabilities. The idea was to reduce mutual uncertainty and strengthen deterrence. Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev rejected the idea out of hand.
The advent of the orbiting satellite circumvented the objection. By 1960, we had launched our first working spy satellite. But our greatest luck was the fact that the Soviets got to space first. Sputnik orbiting over the United States and Eisenhower never protesting a violation of U.S. sovereignty established forever the principle that orbital space is not national territory but is as free and open as the high seas. Had we beaten the Russians into orbit and we were only a few months behind Khrushchev might very well have protested our presence over sovereign Soviet territory and reserved the right to one day (the technology was still years away) shoot us down.
- It's déjà vu all over again with...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The pros and...
- Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
- George F. Will: A liberal squeeze play to...
- Utah Senator Orrin Hatch is a loyal advocate...
- Would repossessing federal lands help fund...
- John Florez: Let's make education's Common...
- Letter: UTA's free fare should not be abolished
- Letter: Lee's financial bungle reflects...
37 - Letter: Obama throws a curveball
31 - Thomas Sowell: Raising taxes on rich...
26 - It's déjà vu all over again...
25 - Letter: Age really matters regarding...
21 - Obama and Romney should speak truth on...
21 - Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
18 - Hatch's debating 'issue' is manufactured
12






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments