From Deseret News archives:

Utah justices ponder child-exploitation case

Published: Wednesday, Sept. 26, 2007 12:19 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The conviction of a Utahn on several child-exploitation charges came to the attention of the Utah Supreme Court at a recent hearing when the defendant's attorney raised numerous questions about the case.

In April 2005, Lexis Alinas, now 47, was convicted of seven counts of exploitation of a minor, and eventually was sentenced to one to 15 years in prison on each second-degree felony count. But the prison term was suspended on all counts, and Alinas was placed on probation for 36 months.

The defendant spent 607 days in jail.

The convictions stem from an incident Jan. 21, 2004, when a reference librarian at the University of Utah's Marriott Library walked past a bank of computers and noticed the headline "Little Girls extreme" across the top of the defendant's computer screen, according to court documents.

The defense position throughout Alinas' case centered around the defendant's struggle with his gender identity. Those details were raised Wednesday along with other constitutional, procedural and professional grievances from the lower court trial.

Story continues below
Alinas said after the hearing he has struggled with his sexual identity for his entire life. For about the past 17 years, Alinas has dressed as a woman and presented herself as a woman in most aspects of her life. Her driver's license lists her as female and she tried hormones to develop breast tissue until she ran out of money.

Alinas has been unable to afford a sex change operation.

She asserts she was looking at the pictures with which she was caught to see what she would have looked like as a little girl.

"I was wanting the pictures for a nonsexual reason," she said Wednesday. "For my own peace of mind to make sense of my gender identity."

These issues were raised in the lower court. A summary of the issues raised before the state's highest court on Wednesday by Alinas' attorney, Ronald Fujino, included the following assertion: That the lower court did not properly instruct the jury on "sexually explicit conduct" in relation to depictions of children on which the case is based.

He also said Alinas' earlier attorneys should have worked harder to demonstrate that the pictures Alinas had were not in violation of what is allowable.

"Take a movie like 'Traffic,'" Fujino said of the film in which adults are portrayed as minors. With instructions similar to those given to Alinas' jury, those depictions would have been improper.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Are they going on missions?

RSL gets warm reception at Capitol

I had the chance tuesday to greet the players in their party, take pictures...

Don't mess with the Cougars!

Nice article. I was not aware that mormons celebrated christmas.

Can LDS even be fully commissioned chaplains in the military?

Letters: Left-wing hypocrisy

So, Mr. Obama is only a casual acquaintance of Bill Ayers? Isn't it just a...

Boys basketball rankings

"disgruntled parents need to stay of the blog?" Do we live in Communist China...

Cougars turn back Wildcats'

This is proof that you really are the elite of college BB. Just like the BCS...

Davis man sues over Tasering

The officers should be charged with attempted murder. They attacked an...

Closing the cave was a extreme response to a delicate situation.Sealing the...

Advertisements