From Deseret News archives:

Rethink coal needs, panel says

Earth can't tolerate it, suppliers can't keep up

Published: Saturday, Sept. 15, 2007 12:35 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
America's commitment to coal as its favorite source of electricity has to be closely evaluated and perhaps eventually abandoned, a panel of leading environmental, climate and industry representatives said during a two-hour public forum Thursday night.

As the public utilities power up to meet the demands of the growing West, coal-generated electricity cannot continue to be the primary source of power — currently 90 percent of the supply. The environment can't tolerate it and suppliers can't handle it, panelists said during Thursday's session of the ongoing Science and Society Public Dialogue series.

Richard Walje, President of Pacific Corp., the parent company of Rocky Mountain Power, said population growth alone in Utah will create a 3,500 megawatt deficit in the state by 2016.

"There are more people, and more people are using more electricity," Walje said. "In addition, it turns out Utah has the highest average square footage per household in the country. And those homeowners aren't happy with a swamp cooler, and they want high-definition televisions."

With the conflicting goals of generating power and reducing carbon emissions, "It's not clear how we're going to pull that off."

Story continues below
Other panelists agreed, pointing out that there is no clear path for what individuals, let alone industry, environmentalists and government agencies, can do that will make any difference at all with the dramatic climate changes that scientists say are well under way.

Jim Steenberg, a climatologist with the University of Utah, said the global mean temperature of the earth has increased 1.3 degrees in the past 100 years. Many believe it will increase by 3 to 9 degrees in the next 100 years. "Three degrees we can tolerate, nine degrees we couldn't."

Like a thermostat in a house, changes made now will not be felt immediately. "We are committed to dealing with the effects of greenhouse gasses from the past century," Steenberg said. "And any choices that we make today won't have any real effect for at least 20 years."

Methods currently being researched to make renewable power available are at least 50 years from implementation, the panelists agreed.

Something that could be done with immediate effect is conservation, but few people really do much about it, they said.

A big problem is that consumers have had constant and abundant access to electricity for so long most people only think about it when there is a power outage, with little thought about what they can do to keep their personal use down.

Recent comments

I am sick that the human race is pushed aside to make a few greedy...

Utah Moms for Clean Air | Sept. 19, 2007 at 10:20 a.m.

I have to wonder if those so in favor of the proposed plant would...

BE YOUR BROTHERS KEEPER | Sept. 15, 2007 at 12:39 p.m.

The people of Sevier County are being treated as second class...

James Kennon | Sept. 15, 2007 at 10:07 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Harline is still open...!!!

Jazz hope D-Will returns soon

i'm not sure if i can handle listening to David Locke either. maybe i just...

Letters: Utah not all rosy

A couple walked into an Open House, looked around and said, "We love the...

UTAH had won the previous 3 games against TCU. I am happy with 3 out of 4...

Haters don't waste your time and RLSers don't feed the trolls. For those...

Aggies beat Spartans in snowy Logan

Congratulations Utah State. It is good to see USU in the middle of the pack...

When did the NBA prove they are the best league in the world? I don't...

Letters: Utah not all rosy

I hear you Lindsay. Moving to Utah in the 6th grade, after living all over...

TCU creams U.

Mr. Roberts. What a stupid statement. You obviously didn't read all the...

this is so nice for us RSL fans and for the state of utah and SLC. The media...

Advertisements
Advertisement