From Deseret News archives:

Bush orders gradual troop cuts

President firmly rejects calls to conclude war

Published: Friday, Sept. 14, 2007 12:16 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
WASHINGTON — President Bush, defending an unpopular war, ordered gradual reductions in U.S. forces in Iraq on Thursday night and said, "The more successful we are, the more American troops can return home."

Yet, Bush firmly rejected calls to end the war, insisting that Iraq will still need military, economic and political support from Washington after his presidency ends.

Bush said that 5,700 U.S. forces would be home by Christmas and that four brigades — for a total of at least 21,500 troops — would return by July, along with an undetermined number of support forces. Now at its highest level of the war, the U.S. troop strength stands at 168,000.

"The principle guiding my decisions on troop levels in Iraq is: return on success," the president said, trying to summon the nation's resolve once again to help Iraq "defeat those who threaten its future and also threaten ours."

With no dramatic change in course, Bush's decision sets the stage for a fiery political debate in Congress and on the 2008 presidential campaign trail. Democrats said Bush's modest approach was unacceptable.

"An endless and unlimited military presence in Iraq is not an option," said Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Island, a former Army Ranger, who delivered the Democratic response.

Story continues below
"Democrats and Republicans in Congress — and throughout the nation — cannot and must not stand idly by while our interests throughout the world are undermined and our armed forces are stretched toward the breaking point," Reed said. "We intend to exercise our constitutional duty and profoundly change our military's involvement in Iraq."

The reductions announced by Bush represented only a slight hastening of the originally scheduled end of the troop increase that Bush announced in January. When the cutbacks are complete, about 132,000 U.S. forces will be in Iraq.

Bush's speech was the latest turning point in a 4 1/2-year-old war marred by miscalculations, surprises and setbacks.

Almost since the fall of Baghdad, in April 2003, U.S. commanders and administration officials in Washington mistakenly believed they were on track to winding down U.S. involvement and handing off to the Iraqis. Instead, the insurgency intervened and the reality of a country in chaos conspired to deepen the U.S. commitment.

Bush said Iraqi leaders "have asked for an enduring relationship with America.

"And we are ready to begin building that relationship in a way that protects our interests in the region and requires many fewer American troops."

Bush described the withdrawals, and the U.S. forces still fighting in Iraq, as a compromise on which war supporters and opponents could agree.

Recent comments

Somehow, I knew the headline from the Bush speech wasn't going to be...

Mark B | Sept. 14, 2007 at 8:08 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

I'm glad the U is looking into the allegations, it can't hurt. I'm hoping...

Chamber gives ideas for budget

The best way for government to grow the economy is to get out of the way....

Cougars practice with urgency

DON'T TELL US ABOUT IT. SHOW US IN THE NEXT THREE GAMES! LOSE TO UTAH AND...

Liberals and conservatives both are Keynesians who believe that saving money...

Utes remain silent about BCS

what if ... what if ... what if ... what if ... what if ... there are...

Letters: Obama 'too busy'

The sound of the wingnuts whining as they twist in the wind! There is...

I hear that Senator Chris Buttars is thinking of being a co-sponsor of the...

Celtics crush Jazz

"I wouldn't mind them rebounding... There weren't any rules against them...

The solution is to get rid of the retirement plans that government offers....

Audit calls to end rehiring retirees

I am not sure but I think a lot of these cases they are not putting money...

Advertisements
Advertisement