From Deseret News archives:

Approval of mine plans flayed

Senators target MSHA response to 'bumps' in Crandall Canyon

Published: Thursday, Sept. 6, 2007 12:07 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
WASHINGTON — The government should never have approved plans for the Crandall Canyon Mine in Utah, experts told a Senate subcommittee Wednesday.

The head of the Mine Safety and Health Administration responded that he would not draw any conclusions until after a full investigation.

The hearing before the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education marked the first of what is expected to be several congressional hearings into the Aug. 6 Crandall Canyon accident, in which six miners were trapped and are presumed dead, and three rescuers died trying to reach them.

Subcommittee members, as well as Utah's U.S. Sens. Orrin Hatch and Bob Bennett, asked MSHA head Richard Stickler for details on what happened in the mine, what can be done in the future to avoid other accidents and how MSHA should handle accidents in the future.

Noticeably absent from the hearing was the mine's co-owner, Murray Energy chief Robert Murray, who had been asked by the subcommittee to attend and be a witness. But Murray was "still deeply involved in the aftermath of the rescue efforts," according to the company, and could not come to Washington, D.C.

Story continues below
Subcommittee Chairman Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, said the senators would give Murray another chance to appear before them, but he and the subcommittee's top Republican, Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, have not ruled out issuing a subpoena if necessary.

"We will not allow him to avoid answering questions from this subcommittee," said Specter, who called Murray "a real troublemaker on the scene," because he gave incorrect information to the media and the public.

During the hearing, Harkin and other subcommittee members asked Stickler about the "bumps," or mine structure failures, that caused the collapse Aug. 6 that trapped the six miners.

Stickler said he had never seen a mine bump as "catastrophic" as this one, which registered 3.9 on the Richter scale. The force of the bump "was so intense" that it blew out ventilation controls about a half mile from where the miners were working. Another bump killed the three rescuers trying to clear out the collapsed coal by hand.

Stickler said MSHA had approved a roof-control plan on June 15 for retreat mining in the same area where the accident occurred. He said Agapito Associates, a mining engineering company, concluded that retreat mining could be done safely and that MSHA required additional roof supports.

The same company did an earlier evaluation on retreat mining in another area of the mine and came to a similar conclusion. However, a "bump" took place there in March and MSHA did not know about it until after the August accident, he said.

Recent comments

Bumps and earth quakes are similar in that they are both methods of...

stressed | Sept. 20, 2007 at 9:04 a.m.

yeah right::
Your writing skills are about as good as your thinking...

Price Utah | Sept. 6, 2007 at 10:08 p.m.

And if you never been there and seen a bounce you would beleive,...

yeah right | Sept. 6, 2007 at 9:42 p.m.

Image
Dennis Cook, Associated Press

Richard Stickler, head of the Mine Safety and Health Administration, testifies in Washington Wednesday.

previousnext

Latest comments

Aurum, I predict the liberals will be thrown out in huge numbers in 2010. The...

Glenn Beck to enter politics?

The idea (fantasy) of Palin and Beck at a table having a logically sound,...

Good for Beck. His opponents couldn't carry a debate based on facts and...

You delusional conservatives had your chance, you put this country in the...

Even in a win there are cougar fans complaining about the refs. cougar fans...

IN answer to Harmons question: YES!!!!!

Obama has already lost 2012.

THe jazz do not depend on boozer, how well the team does depends on how...

Perfect -- the dumb leading the dumber.

Utes crush Aztecs 38-7

the U program is indebted to you. you represented us well!

Advertisements