Rove airs his news inside the Journal

NEW YORK — On the day it was revealed that the man credited with putting President Bush in the White House was quitting, there were no banner headlines in the country's major newspapers.

There was no mention of it on the front page of The Washington Post, The New York Times or USA Today.

That's because Karl Rove, Bush's close friend and chief political strategist, chose to quietly make the announcement through an interview with longtime acquaintance Paul Gigot, the editorial page editor of the Wall Street Journal.

It was Rove doing what he has done, consummately, for his tenure in the White House: controlling the message.

The Journal, which is owned by Dow Jones & Co., told readers on the front page of its Monday editions to turn to the editorial pages for the "why" behind the Rove story.

There, Gigot revealed Rove's resignation in a lengthy recap of his soft-hitting interview with the longtime Bush adviser, held in Rove's "book-lined living room of his townhome on Saturday afternoon."

The paper's news pages had no mention of the day's biggest scoop.

"Rove has done this very skillfully, he's the master of spin," said Louis Ureneck, chair of the journalism department at Boston University. "He selected a friendly environment in which to make his announcement and in a sense control the message. If he had told a reporter, he likely would have faced tougher questions."

Rove's resignation comes as Americans grow more dissatisfied with the U.S. role in the war in Iraq and President Bush's approval ratings at near-record lows.

Rick Edmonds, a media business analyst with the Poynter Institute, a school for journalists in St. Petersburg, Fla., said it was no surprise Rove chose the Journal's editorial page to announce his departure because it is widely considered to support Republican causes.

"It is plugged in to conservative sources in the administration and is often friendly to their viewpoint," he said.

Media watchers said the Journal's editorial board's handling the story independently of the newsroom was not unprecedented, or even anything that violated journalism principles.

"Many editorial writers do collect news on their own and occasionally they learn something before the news side," Ureneck said. "What this demonstrates is that the two sides operate independently, and that's a good thing."