WASHINGTON Attorney General Alberto Gonzales late Friday declined to provide more information about discrepancies in his sworn testimony about the purge of federal prosecutors and its aftermath.
Critics say the differences indicate that he misled Congress about his department's purge of federal prosecutors, but Gonzales has denied that.
Still, Gonzales' refusal to clarify the inconsistencies increases the likelihood that lawmakers of both parties will seek ways to pry him from office.
In a two-page letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, Gonzales reiterated his position that alleged violations of the USA Patriot Act were mistakes rather than civil liberties abuses. He said he was not aware of any political briefings at the Justice Department akin to those given by White House political aides at other federal agencies.
And he offered a classified briefing on the reason for now-famous hospital visit to Attorney John Ashcroft in 2004.
"I hope that the committee will find this information helpful," Gonzales finished.
Apparently not.
"It is deeply regrettable that it takes so much work and effort for this attorney general to try to justify answers that appear to remain far short of the full truth the American people should expect from the nation's top law enforcement officer," Leahy, D-Vt., said in a statement.
"This is a non-clarification clarification," said Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., who has called for a special prosecutor.
It's routine for congressional witnesses to send follow-up letters to the committee to clarify or correct their statements.
Gonzales' case is anything but routine. Lawmakers and the inspector general of the Justice Department want to know why he testified that he has not talked with other witnesses about the firings, when his former White House liaison, Monica Goodling, testified that he spoke to her about them. Gonzales did not address that discrepancy in his letter Friday.
Leahy has said he would refer the Justice Department's inspector general to Gonzales' inconsistencies if the attorney general did not provide enough answers in his letter Friday but the chairman stopped short of doing so in his statement.
Gonzales' critics say his statements probably don't amount to perjury or making false statements to Congress both crimes. But several lawmakers on the committee think he may be guilty of misconduct.
Whatever the outcome, Gonzales' standing among some members of Congress is beyond saving.
On Thursday, Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., shifted from deferring to the president on Gonzales' fate to calling called outright for Congress to "find a way to end the tenure of Attorney General Gonzales."
- News analysis: From confidence to confusion...
- Studies try to find why poorer people are...
- Olympic hurdler Lolo Jones says she's a...
- Where did Memorial Day originate?
- Astronauts enter world's 1st private supply ship
- Does Romney's faith concern a quarter of...
- Hunger in Africa stalks 1M children
- CIA remembers fallen covert operatives
- News analysis: From confidence to...
56 - Does Romney's faith concern a quarter...
46 - Search for Mitt Romney running mate in...
35 - Olympic hurdler Lolo Jones says she's a...
31 - Orrin Hatch is now the hunted —...
30 - Can U.S. schools adopt education...
25 - Maine churches fighting gay marriage
25 - Sarah Palin catches flak over her Orrin...
24






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments