From Deseret News archives:

Siding with the thugs

Published: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 12:07 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
It's one of the oldest debates in the book — public health and safety versus personal freedom. Smokers and non-smokers went the rounds over that issue, as have people concerned about the Patriot Act.

Now the National Rifle Association is reading from the same books.

This debate comes down to how much information is too much information for the government. If law enforcement officials can curb violent acts against innocent people by gaining more access to the who, what and where of shady gun purchases, isn't that a good thing?

We think so.

The NRA and various members of Congress differ. And they have won a round.

At the heart of the matter is a wish by local officials to use information gleaned by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives to help track gun dealers who have a habit of selling guns to criminals. Statistics show that 60 percent of guns used in crimes come from just 1 percent of dealers. Ferreting out such weasels would seem to be a no-brainer. But Congress, citing fears about privacy issues, killed the notion before it had a chance.

Those who favored information sharing said that killing the measure simply put the cops in handcuffs instead of the bad guys.

We agree there, as well.

Story continues below
Not every new law has to be a slippery slope that erodes basic rights. Sometimes, common sense measures can be put in place without leading to abuses. We feel the fears expressed over shared information were overblown. This isn't about the right to bear arms. It's about the right of citizens to feel safe. Putting gun dealers out of business who cynically traffic in weapons they know will be used to intimidate, injure and kill innocent people shouldn't cause such heartburn.

The NRA is a powerful lobby. In many cases the organization has stood convincingly on principle. But not on this one. This move was simply emblematic of overreaction and unnecessary anxiety. It's fear mongering.

This was a classic debate between public safety and personal freedom. Public safety should have ruled the day. It didn't. And the nation less safe because of it.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Will state consider gay rights law?

re Bob | 8:03 a.m. Nov. 12, 2009 "As a property owner I should have the...

Celtics crush Jazz

the vocal, ignorant in this case, minority who say Sloan is part of the...

I like RSL and what it brings to Utah, I love the World Cup and is one of...

TCU won't raise BCS fuss

you are right BYU was not in the same class this year as TCU, but you were...

Tavernari has matured

He has been so great and fun to watch in the NCAA Tournament. I really think...

I hope both teams play hard. I know SJ has hit the weights in the offseason...

Tavernari has matured

Ya, it's tough when an athletic team like Utah wins the conference last year,...

Celtics crush Jazz

Boozer's mouth and previous statements are an issue mostly with the fans and...

Tavernari has matured

We all know that there are no U fans, just BYU haters. Wouldn't is be nice...

A successful conclusion to a war means the enemy is no longer capable of...

Advertisements
Advertisement