From Deseret News archives:

Splitting a school district is complex

Property taxes would go up — or maybe down

Published: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 12:02 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
A new east-side district would have to raise taxes to run schools, a final study on the proposal to split Granite School District states. But, district officials pointed out Tuesday, there's no legal room to do that.

So just how financially feasible is splitting Utah's second-largest school district?

A Wikstrom Economic & Planning Consultants final report and Granite District differ, and the latter says the public needs to ask more questions on money needed to keep a new and remaining district afloat and how student programs will be affected.

Meanwhile, caught in the fray is Murray School District, which would inherit some $94 million in land and buildings by not participating in a Granite District split.

The matter is complex.

Salt Lake County, Holladay and South Salt Lake are considering breaking off from Granite and forming their own district. They commissioned Wikstrom to conduct a feasibility study on the matter.

A movement to split the Jordan School District also is under way.

Last spring, Wikstrom released a preliminary study; the final version is dated June 25 but has not yet been publicly discussed by the county and two cities.

Story continues below
The east side has 22 percent to 24 percent of the students but 42 percent of the district's tax base. A new east district would have $3,110 per student from local property taxes alone (not including hefty state funds); the remaining district, $1,150 per student. But the district says much of the money is the wrong brand: Capital instead of operations cash.

The final report acknowledges the new district is financially feasible, though "operations are projected to require more than the statutorily allowed property tax," the district points out. The report says the same thing about the remaining west-side district.

But then the study concludes the new district's operations and building needs can be funded without a property tax and property owners may realize a tax cut.

So, the district says, which is it?

"To us, it doesn't make sense at all to say it's financially feasible," Granite Superintendent Steve Ronnenkamp said. "Someone's going to have to make some tough decisions on what they're going to cut."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

I love Melrose place!!!

[By law, we already can't discriminate against someone based on religion,...

Marjorie appears to be the only one in the dark as to Hasan's motives. It's...

comment. Soon enough the apple harvest will be over and those horrible "apple...

12 high schools ready for 'The Turf'

Post from 10/22: "i bet someone besides alta, bingham or pg wins the 5A...

bingham vs. alta is going to be an awesome game. So many people went to the...

Nobody on the Jazz will make the All-Star team West PGs 1.Steve Nash -...

Editorial: Lessons from Berlin

Evidently Barak Obama has ALREADY done more to promote peace in the world...

To 3:35 Not kidding. You are right Alta beat Timpview this year, the fact...

Bush? You forgot that he was also a Christian, that has to be his greatest...

Advertisements
Advertisement