From Deseret News archives:

Splitting a school district is complex

Property taxes would go up — or maybe down

Published: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 12:02 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
A new east-side district would have to raise taxes to run schools, a final study on the proposal to split Granite School District states. But, district officials pointed out Tuesday, there's no legal room to do that.

So just how financially feasible is splitting Utah's second-largest school district?

A Wikstrom Economic & Planning Consultants final report and Granite District differ, and the latter says the public needs to ask more questions on money needed to keep a new and remaining district afloat and how student programs will be affected.

Meanwhile, caught in the fray is Murray School District, which would inherit some $94 million in land and buildings by not participating in a Granite District split.

The matter is complex.

Salt Lake County, Holladay and South Salt Lake are considering breaking off from Granite and forming their own district. They commissioned Wikstrom to conduct a feasibility study on the matter.

A movement to split the Jordan School District also is under way.

Last spring, Wikstrom released a preliminary study; the final version is dated June 25 but has not yet been publicly discussed by the county and two cities.

Story continues below
The east side has 22 percent to 24 percent of the students but 42 percent of the district's tax base. A new east district would have $3,110 per student from local property taxes alone (not including hefty state funds); the remaining district, $1,150 per student. But the district says much of the money is the wrong brand: Capital instead of operations cash.

The final report acknowledges the new district is financially feasible, though "operations are projected to require more than the statutorily allowed property tax," the district points out. The report says the same thing about the remaining west-side district.

But then the study concludes the new district's operations and building needs can be funded without a property tax and property owners may realize a tax cut.

So, the district says, which is it?

"To us, it doesn't make sense at all to say it's financially feasible," Granite Superintendent Steve Ronnenkamp said. "Someone's going to have to make some tough decisions on what they're going to cut."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

Late in the 4th quarter BYU will score yet another TD against an overrated...

Locke is Terrible!!!!!!!! It's TV or nothing for me. I hope Sloan continues...

Ex-Ute returns to celebrate

staying and not leaving for the BC$ schools

I just hope KWhitt stays around another year or two, but after all the rumors...

This Temple will be a great benefit to the LDS in that region and to the...

Coaches Poll TCU 4 BYU 15 Utah 19 Come on Saturday, can't wait for...

Thank you Senators!! Someone - at least 37 of you - has some sense. I will...

If this happens and Beck remains at Faux News, all America will know that he...

Playing & playbooks

I grew up LDS in the Cleveland area. It really was a unique place to be,...

Nothing good comes out of animal testing laboratories unless you believe in...

Advertisements