From Deseret News archives:

Not every Apple item has been a success

Published: Thursday, June 28, 2007 12:15 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
However, the Cube didn't work differently from other Macintosh computers, it just looked different. People weren't willing to pay a premium for the design alone. The iPhone will both look and work differently from other phones, so the higher price may well be justified.

The Cube idea lives on in the Mac Mini, a rather more successful but less eye-catching small Mac.

EWorld, 1994. This was Apple's attempt to create an alternative to America Online, then a pre-World Wide Web Internet service with bulletin boards and e-mail.

EWorld was easy to use and had an appealing interface, but closed after just two years, killed by its exclusivity — it was open only to Macintosh users — and a lack of marketing. Today's Apple certainly doesn't stint on marketing, and while it clearly favors the Macintosh, its iPod, the iPhone and some of its software work on Windows PC.

The one-button mouse, 1983. There's not much to criticize about this design decision at the time it was made. Mice were new and Apple made an informed choice to use only one button for maximum ease of use. With only one button to push, there was no confusion.

Story continues below
But Microsoft Corp.'s Windows operating system showed that two buttons were useful and manageable, and Apple's one-button regime started to become a liability in the '90s, at least when it came to winning over Windows users. Despite this, Apple held out till 2005 before introducing a mouse that could sense right and left clicks.< Simplicity is great, but sometimes, less really is less.

The iMac, 1998. The iMac was by no means a miss. It was a great success, helping Apple recover some lost market share in the computer business. It demonstrated that Apple could get ahead with products that are both functional and look great.

But when was the last time you were excited about an iMac? The craze faded pretty fast, and the iMac's greatest legacy may be the initial "i," now associated mainly with the iPod, and a few landfills worth of peripherals in translucent plastic, which the iMac made obligatory for a while.

In 10 years, will the iPod be remembered mainly as the ancestor of the iPhone? Or will it be the iPhone that's remembered only as a brilliant but short-lived inspiration, like the Newton? Nobody can say.

In consumer electronics, a decade is a lifetime, and everyone is mortal.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

BYU eager for crack at Oregon State

Keep it clean or go join the Crimson Line!

BCS reform still needed

I think that the TCU and Boise State teams should agree to not play the game....

BYU eager for crack at Oregon State

No, Maxie will not make it. He'll be QBing for Utah since their QB couldn't...

I would hate it if the Jazz end up having a record that warrants only one...

Fewer bees mean fewer plants get pollinated which means less food. What do...

I ask with sincerity, who of you 59 commenting have read Palin's book? Write...

A woman shouldn't have an abortion, because of the right's of the child -...

TCU versus BSU unpopular

BYU Fan & BCS Cowards, I agree, they should withdraw to make a point but...

Everybody whines every time we get the invite to the Vegas Bowl, why? Here is...

Utahn aiding poor

Louis has inspired me to be passionately involved with the poor both with my...

Advertisements