From Deseret News archives:

Vote on a 4th seat for Utah likely in mid-July

Published: Monday, June 25, 2007 12:37 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
WASHINGTON — Utah's fourth-seat bill may have to wait until after the July 4 recess for a Senate floor vote, but the bill's supporters are working hard to make sure it passes.

Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, sent a letter to his fellow senators Thursday outlining reasons why they should vote for the bill. Members of DC Vote, an advocacy group, had meetings in 21 Senate offices on Wednesday.

The pending bill would create a fourth House seat for Utah and allow the District of Columbia to get a vote in the House. Utah missed a seat after the 2000 Census, and D.C. Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton cannot vote in the House.

"Congress is on firm constitutional ground in righting two wrongs: the long-standing failure to provide for full House representation for the District and the recent denial of appropriate representation for Utah," Hatch said in the letter, which was co-signed by Sen. Joe Liebermann, I-Conn. "Congress should seize the day and do what is right."

DC Vote Executive Director Ilir Zherka said he anticipates a Senate floor vote in mid-July. The Senate is currently working on an energy bill and will potentially take up the immigration bill next week before going on a scheduled weeklong recess, but things are constantly in flux.

Story continues below
Some senators have constitutional problems with the bill, saying the District of Columbia is not a state so it cannot have a voting member without a constitutional amendment or other Constitution-based arguments.

In his letter, Hatch justified that the bill is constitutional, pointing to several interpretations and adding that an amendment to the bill last week prohibits the legislation from tacking on two senators for the District as well.

"For those who have lingering doubts, the bill provides for expedited consideration of any appropriate court challenge," according to the letter.

The House has already approved a similar bill but would need to vote again because the Senate bill is slightly different. The House calls for an at-large seat for Utah until the next census, while the Senate version would leave the decision up to the state as to how it would use the new seat.


E-mail: suzanne@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

BYU's Lamb, Jorgensen reprimanded

Cut Blocks are legal, period. Ever seen a running back try to take on a D...

Hatch deserves to be censured for the HOLY WAR comment. It would be an even...

Bronco, Kyle rubber match

In 2006 and 2007 when BYU was winning MWC titles yet needed LUCKY to pull out...

@Anonymous 1:34 p.m.: "Go (sic) she ran a business poorly." She ran the...

I guess it's rivalry week, because all the comments I've read today have been...

If I may offer a bit of education to the misinformed... An LDS meeting house...

Springville should be #1 in 4A.

"I about fell out of my chair when I read Anon 9:06's post that "liberals...

"If you live in Utah, you are likely to be surrounded by mormons. " You...

Plenty on line for rivalry game

Hey, to Mr. "Important Statistic," do your homework next time -- if you can...

Advertisements