From Deseret News archives:

FDA plans curbs on animal antibiotics

Published: Wednesday, Jan. 27, 1999 12:00 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
WASHINGTON -- The government plans to impose strict new rules on antibiotics given to farm animals to combat concerns that the medicines are creating drug-resistant germs that wind up in the meat people eat.

Antibiotics are fast losing their ability to fight infections, mostly because people misuse the vital drugs: Doctors often overprescribe them and patients often don't take them properly.But scientists say antibiotics used on the farm now are causing foodborne bacteria to mutate into treatment-resistant forms -- so the Food and Drug Administration is preparing rules to try to curb the problem.

"It's an issue that won't go away and can no longer be ignored," said Michigan veterinarian Keith Sterner, who chaired a panel of FDA's advisers that backed most of the agency's plans Tuesday.

The advisory committee said FDA's plan to force antibiotic manufacturers to conduct on-the-farm testing of drug resistance probably would never work. But overall, the FDA has proposed "a sound framework" of more strict animal drug regulation, Sterner said.

Story continues below
A two-day meeting to deliberate the FDA's proposals highlighted how bitter a controversy the issue is. On one side, the animal drug industry denies there is any serious risk to consumers, noting that no one has died from eating meat tainted with untreatable germs. On the other side, public health experts say they must act to protect consumers from that ever happening.

Critics "never stood at the bedside of a critically ill patient ... hoping the antibiotics will work and having to deal with the consequences when they don't," said Dr. David Bell of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. He pleaded with the industry to find a compromise that protects consumers while still providing farmers with drugs vital for animal health.

Manufacturers adamantly oppose many of FDA's plans, saying the rules would make it too difficult -- and expensive -- to create new antibiotics for animals. They argued that the government instead should study whether on-the-farm antibiotics really pose an imminent threat, and educate farmers and veterinarians to more prudently use the drugs.

"We believe the agency is overreacting," said Dr. Brendan Fox, president of Elanco Animal Health.

That prompted a fierce reaction from one of FDA's advisors: "If there is no risk, you shouldn't be afraid of" the FDA's rules, said CDC's Dr. Frederick Angulo.

Almost half the 50 million pounds of U.S.-produced antibiotics is used in animals. Eighty percent is used, not to treat sick animals, but to promote animals' growth by adding small doses into their feed.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Teachers begin to teach for the test when test scores are the measuring...

they should be transplanted to central park NY

BYU has Washington in opener

Sark went 5-7. He's got a lot to prove still. The way I see it, it should...

Bailout Bob voted for TARP when the majority of Utahns were against it....

Knitting people together

Jan was my teacher when I attended Brighton High School. Our lives...

I have a suggestion on a way to cut the runaway federal spending and reduce...

Is this a clarion call for civil conflict? Sounds like it.

Chaffetz rails against fed control

Jason getting things done Rep. Jason Chaffetz has been fighting for *...

Utah Jazz Ironmen

Just one more reason why, even though the contract wasn't ideal, the Jazz had...

Lawmakers, educators debate plan

Do they really think $2000 is going to make a teacher go "above and beyond?"...

Advertisements