From Deseret News archives:

Municipalities seeking state funds to pay extra costs for voucher referendum

Utah Supreme Court says voters should decide yes or no

Published: Saturday, June 9, 2007 12:09 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Sure, there's been confusion over this November's ballot question on private school vouchers. But even though that was cleared up Friday by a Utah Supreme Court decision, another question remains.

Who's going to pay for the election?

Municipalities statewide have already budgeted funds to hold local elections on Nov. 6. The problem is, since it turned into a statewide election, the price tag is going to be more than 2 1/2 times higher.

So Lt. Gov. Gary Herbert, whose office oversees elections, is meeting with local leaders to figure out how much the state has to come up with to cover the additional costs of the election.

Right now, a "very, very, very rough estimate" is about $2.3 million, according to Herbert's chief of staff, Joe Demma. That number could change, he said. "There's a lot of people coming to the table right now."

That includes nearly $1.2 million that the state would distribute to counties to run the election. The rest would be needed by the lieutenant governor's office to pay for technical support for electronic voting machines and putting together a voter information pamphlet.

Story continues below
Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr., who set the election date for the voucher referendum just last month, said he wouldn't have chosen Nov. 6 without assurances that local governments would be reimbursed for the unanticipated costs.

Legislative leaders said that they would come up with the money. Senate President John Valentine, R-Orem, said they're waiting for more details. "The discussion is ongoing," Valentine said.

One option that's being talked about is dipping into the $3.35 million already allocated for next year's presidential primary on Feb. 5. "That's a pretty easy solution," Valentine said.

Demma said pitches will be made later this month to both the Republican and Democratic legislative caucuses to make sure lawmakers are comfortable with that option — and that that money will be replenished in time to pay for the Feb. 5 presidential primary.

"We're all in kind of new territory here, figuring it out," said Brian Thompson, Utah County clerk and auditor. Thompson said it's only fair that the state make up the difference, since municipalities had no idea they needed to budget for a statewide election.

"It's really not fair for the cities," Thompson said. "They are the ones caught up in the middle of this."

Now costs will go up in cities like Morgan, where leaders budgeted just $2,000 for the November general election. City leaders budgeted so low because they planned to use paper ballots, said Lincoln Shurtz, legislative analyst for the Utah League of Cities and Towns.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
Deseret Morning News graphic

previousnext

Latest comments

So, if you put in the time, retire according to the standards available to...

I agree! I am offended that taxpayers dollars are spent on this!

There is one major difference between Obama's plan and Bush's plan - Obama is...

That sounds like an argument to legalize drug use - not an argument to ban...

Good job Flyers, you've represented Southern Utah well, you are a class act....

2A: Broncos vs. Wildcats

South Summitt... wanna know the best part about beatin you guys in 98, 00 and...

I'm with you about your right to make decisions about your own health. I...

12 Utes return to Texas

After last year's horrible performance, I'm sure TCU is seeking some...

K>A>C GOOD LUCK TO BOTH TEAMS!!

Celtics crush Jazz

Defense Defense Defense Defense Defense Defense Defense. Outside shooting...

Advertisements
Advertisement