From Deseret News archives:

Huntsman, Valentine hope top court will act on vouchers

Published: Tuesday, June 5, 2007 12:15 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
While Utah GOP House leaders are ready to move into a special legislative session looking to solve the private school voucher mess before a Nov. 6 public vote, Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. and Senate Republicans want to wait to see if the Utah Supreme Court will bail out the other two branches of government.

"It's premature" for Huntsman to call a special session, said Senate President John Valentine, R-Orem. "Let the courts have their constitutional responsibilities fulfilled first."

"In the short term, the governor wants to wait for the courts," said Lisa Roskelley, spokeswoman for Huntsman. Thus, Huntsman's consideration for a special session "is not imminent."

However, if the high court doesn't soon provide "clarity" on the voucher referendum vote, both the governor and Valentine say the executive and legislative branches will have to act.

"We believe the (Supreme Court) is on the fast track" to make a decision, said Roskelley.

But, actually, it may not be on the "fast track" to make a broad voucher decision that adds "clarity."

That's because to get before the high court the question of whether the Nov. 6 referendum would really install or repeal vouchers in Utah, a State Board of Education decision last week not to implement vouchers via HB174 must be appealed.

Story continues below
And while the pro-vouchers groups — the logical plaintiff in such a suit — has 30 days to appeal the state board's action, in fact for political and public relation reasons they may not want to.

And so far leaders on the pro-voucher side say there has been no movement to challenge the board.

That leaves the high court to just decide whether the ballot language written for Nov. 6. is proper or not — a separate suit that has nothing to do with the state board's refusal to implement vouchers now.

Ultimately, that very limited issue of proper ballot language may not be broad enough for the Supreme Court to rule on whether the Nov. 6 vote is a clear up-or-down decision by citizens on vouchers — something Huntsman and GOP legislative leaders all say they want.

The high court will hear oral arguments Friday on the ballot language question. There is no scheduled hearing on the issue of whether HB174 would implement voucher law if voters repeal the original voucher bill — HB148 — on Nov. 6.

"I would be very antsy if we don't have" a broad voucher clarity decision from the high court by September, said Valentine.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

Yeah this guys right, TCU would beat everybody. In fact if they played every...

Words from Harry Reid. A man who is trying to bankrupt what is left of the...

pretty well. The Jazz got killed on the inside. The switching defense is not...

We have been living in Utah about a year and thought that the state leaders...

re: Carolyn | 9:45 a.m. Dec. 7, 2009 Insert something about vermin & the...

Protect the big bad BCS teams from losing to non-BCS teams. Wouldn't want two...

Cougars going back to Vegas

Buster | 3:01 p.m. Dec. 7, 2009 Think Karl and John want a ring? Think Dr....

I think it's ridiculous how everyone has attacked Max Hall on this. He made a...

Who'd have thunk it...!! If I was a gambler, I would have lost a lot of...

re: tcu beat Air force by what 7 | 5:41 p.m. Dec. 7, 2009 "TCU is good...

Advertisements