From Deseret News archives:

Magazine ads anger opponents of smoking

Do Vogue, others try to glamorize cigarettes?

Published: Thursday, May 31, 2007 12:17 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
NEW YORK — Not long ago, fax machines and e-mail inboxes at Vogue, the world's premier fashion magazine, were briefly assaulted with thousands of angry letters. Not about the latest gorgeously photographed fashion trends or beauty products in its influential pages, but about a single, colorful ad: for Camel No. 9 cigarettes.

"If you draw income from the advertisement of tobacco," Heidi Thompson of Freeport, Ill., wrote in one letter, "you are as guilty as big tobacco companies in selling the health and future of so many of our youth in order to pad your bank accounts."

The letters were part of a grass-roots campaign by an anti-smoking group to get Vogue to drop ads for the new, prettily packaged Camels, which they and others feel are targeted to younger women and teenagers.

But it isn't just Vogue. Pick up nearly any fashion magazine this month — Glamour, Harper's Bazaar, Lucky — and you'll see a colorful cigarette ad mixed in with articles on beauty, fitness, nutrition and glowing skin.

You won't find them in a number of other countries. A European Union law, for example, bans tobacco print ads on grounds they glamorize smoking and promote it among young people.

Story continues below
But in the United States, where TV and radio ads were banned long ago and billboards more recently, print ads are the final frontier in tobacco advertising, aside from store displays and the like. And to anti-smoking groups, their presence, though waning, is especially tasteless in fashion magazines and others aimed at young women — at a time when lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in women.

"Research out there shows that young people are susceptible to advertising," says Ellen Vargyas, counsel for the American Legacy Foundation, established in the wake of the 1998 settlement between the states and the tobacco industry. "I wish the publications themselves would look hard at what they're doing. Readers look to them to see what's cool and what's trendy — and they see cigarettes."

Her organization sponsored a major tobacco report issued last week by the Institute of Medicine, a branch of the National Academy of Sciences. The report, which called on Congress and the president to give the Food and Drug Administration power to regulate tobacco, also had a recommendation for print ads: that they be restricted to black and white text only — no images.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

RE: Maxie | 8:58 a.m. Nov. 29, 2009 How did Max Hall get the last laugh?...

Field goals, penalties doomed Utes

BYU 1 Utah 0 (Zero, zip, nil) You're right there is now no asterisk...

So start building small scale nuclear which can be situated near population...

Aggies blow away T-birds

USU beat SUU in Cedar City last year 72-65. Check your facts.

God Bless your Dad. Hopefully, he will recover. God Bless your family in...

We have a Department of Defence not a Department of Offence. As a Mormon I...

Racheal,since you bring up religious freedom.. what if someone's religious...

As I sit home crossing my fingers hopeing the current administration fails, I...

Unselfish givers are an inspiration

Ah yes, giver's. YOU BETTER BELIEVE the baby-boomer's, and, Elderly and Older...

I don't agree with Max's comments but I do understand his feelings....

Advertisements