You declare in your editorial "A heavy-laden war bill" (May 26) that "Congress has no business tying the hands of the nation's commander in chief during a time of war."
I beg your pardon?
The framers of the Constitution deliberately put funding the military in the hands of Congress as a control to keep one man the president from having too much power.
That's the whole point.
They were all too familiar with Britain's King George III, an absolute monarch, who had absolute power but without accountability, and they wanted none of it.
Whether one agrees or not with the president's conduct of the war in Iraq, the business of Congress is exactly that to be a brake and a control on the executive. It's called "separation of powers."
Kenneth Payne
Spanish Fork
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Opinion
- It's déjà vu all over again with...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The pros and...
- Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
- John Florez: Let's make education's Common...
- Utah Senator Orrin Hatch is a loyal advocate...
- George F. Will: A liberal squeeze play to...
- Hatch's debating 'issue' is manufactured
- Would repossessing federal lands help fund...
Most Commented
Across Site
In Opinion
- Letter: Obama shows allegiance to the...
56 - Letter: Lee's financial bungle reflects...
37 - Letter: Obama throws a curveball
31 - Thomas Sowell: Raising taxes on rich...
26 - Letter: Age really matters regarding...
21 - It's déjà vu all over again...
21 - Obama and Romney should speak truth on...
20 - Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
17






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments