From Deseret News archives:

Governments' approach to religion differs

U. chief outlines 4 ways in talk at LDS history meetings

Published: Friday, May 25, 2007 12:08 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Before migrating West, early Latter-day Saints were persecuted, in part, because government officials at the time were concerned about maintaining political power in the face of a growing LDS minority with different religious views.

That's one way modern theory about the intersection of government and religion can be applied to LDS history, which is the topic of the three-day Mormon History Association meetings that began Thursday night with a speech by University of Utah President Michael Young.

The former chair of the U.S. Commission on Religious Freedom, Young said governments have various ways of dealing with religion based on their beliefs about their own legitimacy and the loyalty they are able to engender among their own citizens. He sees four "archetypes" of how religion and government mesh:

• Authoritarian regimes that suppress any religious expression in order to maintain social and political control, and see religion as a rival center of power. North Korea, Vietnam and, to a large extent, China fit that model.

Story continues below
• Politicians who use state-sponsored religion to provide government with a legitimacy it is unable to generate on its own. Such governments use religion as a moral force to engender loyalty among citizens and to perpetuate laws that maintain the power and authority of both the state and the dominant faith. Iran is a prime example of a nation that engages in sanctioned discrimination against those who don't belong to "the faith."

• Governments that are either unable or unwilling to protect citizens from human-rights abuses carried out by religiously based organizations that use their ideology as an oppressive moral force. Indonesia, India and Pakistan are examples.

• Functioning governments that are secure in their own legitimacy and power but are insecure about the strength of their own people to determine truth. In recent years, both France and Belgium have attempted to shield their citizens from being approached by groups they consider to be "cults" that engage in "overbearing of the will." Latter-day Saints are considered members of a cult by many in Europe, Young said.

Yet many European governments cut a broad swath for and provide economic aid to a growing minority of Muslims within their borders, while also marginalizing them politically and socially. Such an approach comes from "failing to take religion seriously," he said.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

innocuous...thanks online dictionary

Religion in politics is tiresome

"STOP, right there!!! Mike Richards, I am liberal. I am LDS. I do not...

Utes won't respond to Hall

I just don't get it. Why do football fans get so worked up about a game and...

Religion in politics is not the problem. Disrespect for religion is the...

Utes won't respond to Hall

I'm with you.. I will be paying ANY price to have a seat in RES next year.....

Thanks Max, for defending your family and religion from the modern-day mob....

Max Hall issues apology

I was at the game in Provo on Saturday night. It is sad that Max Hall's...

Hall reprimanded by MWC

It's fun to sit back and watch as BOTH BYU and Utah fans make fools out of...

Alta rejects canyon subdivision

Dear Alta Extremist, " Some day a property owner is going to get sick &...

Hall reprimanded by MWC

Too bad that Bronco , Holmoe , and the University didn't gave the guts to do...

Advertisements