From Deseret News archives:

Governments' approach to religion differs

U. chief outlines 4 ways in talk at LDS history meetings

Published: Friday, May 25, 2007 12:08 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Before migrating West, early Latter-day Saints were persecuted, in part, because government officials at the time were concerned about maintaining political power in the face of a growing LDS minority with different religious views.

That's one way modern theory about the intersection of government and religion can be applied to LDS history, which is the topic of the three-day Mormon History Association meetings that began Thursday night with a speech by University of Utah President Michael Young.

The former chair of the U.S. Commission on Religious Freedom, Young said governments have various ways of dealing with religion based on their beliefs about their own legitimacy and the loyalty they are able to engender among their own citizens. He sees four "archetypes" of how religion and government mesh:

• Authoritarian regimes that suppress any religious expression in order to maintain social and political control, and see religion as a rival center of power. North Korea, Vietnam and, to a large extent, China fit that model.

Story continues below
• Politicians who use state-sponsored religion to provide government with a legitimacy it is unable to generate on its own. Such governments use religion as a moral force to engender loyalty among citizens and to perpetuate laws that maintain the power and authority of both the state and the dominant faith. Iran is a prime example of a nation that engages in sanctioned discrimination against those who don't belong to "the faith."

• Governments that are either unable or unwilling to protect citizens from human-rights abuses carried out by religiously based organizations that use their ideology as an oppressive moral force. Indonesia, India and Pakistan are examples.

• Functioning governments that are secure in their own legitimacy and power but are insecure about the strength of their own people to determine truth. In recent years, both France and Belgium have attempted to shield their citizens from being approached by groups they consider to be "cults" that engage in "overbearing of the will." Latter-day Saints are considered members of a cult by many in Europe, Young said.

Yet many European governments cut a broad swath for and provide economic aid to a growing minority of Muslims within their borders, while also marginalizing them politically and socially. Such an approach comes from "failing to take religion seriously," he said.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Best prep football games of 2009

The Lone Peak vs Hunter Game was the the best game all year by far! One of...

BYU would like friendlier rivalry

Any time you get more than 10 people together you will find the kind of fan...

Let's try to throw some common sense into these statistics. 2008 was a year...

Reality: any human, outside of Springville at least, can learn basic algebra...

Expect epic clash on the line

You must be an English major at the U. What is the literacy rate for U fans?

they were spot on for who to protect. russell has been extremely inconsistent...

Letters: Don't buy it

Ultra Bob says "small minority" at the Tea Parties....another dolt who fails...

RSL's Russell left exposed

REal can lose at most one of them according to the rules of the draft....

Is that a new nickname for G.W. Bush? Didn't he know that spending trillions...

Who's on the fringe of society? ========== Ah, that would be you -- Charles.

Advertisements