BOSTON I don't doubt Oprah Winfrey's marketing magic, although we don't know yet whether she can do for politics what she's done for publishing. Her endorsement of the candidate Barack Obama may not be as successful as it was for the author Obama.
But ever since she gave a nod to Obama on the Larry King show, Oprah has brought some extra attention to a familiar and not always welcome question. Are black women, a large and loyal subset of the Democratic Party, going to be torn between two firsts? Will they be black-while-voting or female-while-voting? Or both? Or neither?
Right now, black support is split about evenly between Hillary and Obama. But while the polling numbers are small, there's strong evidence of a gender gap. Obama has a comfortable lead among black men, while black women Oprah notwithstanding overwhelmingly favor Clinton.
There are, surely, many reasons for the support of either candidate. War and peace rank beside race and gender.
But I raise this question because black women in America have historically had the pieces of their identity sliced and diced and they've been asked to pick one. They've been subject to loyalty oaths or disloyalty taunts. They've been talked about as a two-fer minority or a torn-in-two minority.
This tension goes back to Sojourner Truth's famous response to the ministers at the Women's Rights Convention in 1851. After listening to the white men defend women's inequality and gentility, the former slave reportedly asked, "Ain't I a woman?"
There were racists in the women's rights movement, but there were also sexists in the civil-rights movement. After the Civil War, black women were expected to step back and support an amendment extending suffrage only to black men. When Truth rose again in protest, she warned, "There is a great stir about colored men getting their rights but not a word about the colored women; and if colored men get their rights and not colored women theirs, you see the colored men will be masters over the women, and it will be just as bad as it was before."
Of course, we don't need to go back that far to see these tensions. In his infamous confirmation hearings, Clarence Thomas described the sexual harassment charges against him as "a high-tech lynching," thereby defining his opponents as racists. His black accuser, Anita Hill, was cast in female terms as "a little bit nutty and a little bit slutty."
- It's déjà vu all over again with...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The pros and...
- Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
- George F. Will: A liberal squeeze play to...
- Utah Senator Orrin Hatch is a loyal advocate...
- John Florez: Let's make education's Common...
- Would repossessing federal lands help fund...
- Letter: UTA's free fare should not be abolished
- Letter: Lee's financial bungle reflects...
37 - Letter: Obama throws a curveball
31 - Thomas Sowell: Raising taxes on rich...
26 - It's déjà vu all over again...
25 - Letter: Age really matters regarding...
21 - Obama and Romney should speak truth on...
21 - Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
18 - Hatch's debating 'issue' is manufactured
12






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments