From Deseret News archives:

Pro-family advocates network

Published: Sunday, May 13, 2007 12:37 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
WARSAW, Poland — Some 3,300 delegates engaged in pro-family advocacy were attracted to the fourth World Congress of Families in Warsaw to find additional resources for the social agendas they are pursuing at home.

Contact names, printed material, social research and connections with like-minded organizations give the advocates material they hope to use to influence delegates to the United Nations and their federal, state and local governments.

For Arizona-based Family Watch International, that means, in part, collecting names for a pro-family, pro-life petition that states the signers' goal of preserving parental and religious rights. The organization started the petition drive at the Warsaw congress and hopes to collect a million signatures. Talking with other pro-family advocates is getting that petition started. The rest will rely on the power of the Internet, with interested parties encouraged to sign the petition online at familywatchinternational.org.

Family Watch International president Sharon Slater said she has seen the power that face-to-face networking and the global computer network can generate, combining the voices of family advocates.

Story continues below
In 2004, a weekend plea to contact Brazil's delegation to the United Nations in opposition to a provision that would make the expression of sexual orientation a human right attracted 350,000 e-mail responses to the delegation. The effort may have swamped the delegation's computer resources while the incoming e-mail was digested, but the initiative succeeded.

"A lot of the work is just helping people get organized," Slater said from her organization's exhibit booth at the Warsaw event.

Family Watch's exhibit is surrounded by those of organizations that are engaged in similar work.

The similarities add ranks to the advocacy effort in important ways, she said. For example, the United Nations only gives six access passes to each organization.

"The more organizations there are, the more access there is," she said.

Add to that the likelihood that contact from more than one organization increases the chances individuals will decide to contribute their time or money to at least one of the organizations.

Groups that have the same overall interests are also likely to have individual passions or a depth of expertise that differs from another organization.

"That way each can focus on their own passion," she said.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Michael Otterson: A constitutional right

Speak out? Yes. Actively fund and campaign against issues? No. Fund false...

Reagan much-beloved in Utah

To the sniping critics of Ronald Reagan on this forum, I bet most or all of...

BYU still scored on the deception play. In fact Hall threw to Pitta to up...

Robert Johnson sure did great in the TCU game. I see a repeat performance by...

Letters: Hatch's side is evil

Republicans do not want any paternity for this abominable baby being birthed...

St. Paddy's parade

i loooove her hat!!!! it would not scare me out of ireland tho!!!!! she looks...

Letters: Give soldiers a chance

Anonymous | 8:57 a.m. I don't think he's blaming Clinton for the attack....

You are right. Conservatives DO care about facts that are made up, distorted,...

Actually Spike, you are wrong. The Mayor can't raise taxes...only the city...

Letters: Palin on the fringe?

. . . is, indeed "mystified" by Sarah Palin's popularity, it appears Utah...

Advertisements