A Republican revolt was not in the works for Salt Lake County Saturday.

More than 600 members of the county GOP gave their party leaders another two years at the helm, with only the incumbent treasurer, Ted Pierce, defeated by Robert Wright during their organizing convention at the South Towne Expo Center. They also did so in resounding fashion, as both the current chair, James Evans, and vice chair Dana Dixon won with more than three-fourths of the votes, and incumbent secretary Patti Florence won another term with 64 percent of the vote.

Perhaps the most surprising result of the day was votes on two resolutions dealing with the new tuition voucher law, which was passed by the Utah Legislature earlier this year. One of the resolutions "applauded" legislators for passing the Parent Choice in Education Act and urged "all Utahns to support school choice," while the other one opposed vouchers because the party should "reject philosophies that encourage our citizens to become dependent on government programs."

Both resolutions were voted down by the convention delegates after more than an hour of debate.

Supporters of the vouchers law said that the ability for people to send their children to private schools was important, and that vouchers would prevent the double-taxation of those parents.

"Parents make better decisions than government about what is best for their children," said Stanley Cram, the sponsor of the voucher support resolution.

Opponents of vouchers — who supported the freedom of choice in education for parents, just not the government funding — argued that if vouchers were put into place, they would become just another form of government assistance. They also feared that they could potentially place restrictions on what private or home schools could teach.

"We believe in limited government, and if we adopt vouchers, then all of those private schools and home schools will be subject to government regulation," delegate Janet Jensen said.

The county party also rejected sweeping changes to its party platform that supporters said would make it easier to read by consolidating topics, removing issues that are no longer relevant and changing negative stances to positions of support. But opponents worried that the positions on many big issues, including abortion and gun rights, were not strong enough or simply removed.