From Deseret News archives:

Are smaller school districts the answer?

Published: Sunday, May 6, 2007 12:10 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Webb: What's the size of the ideal school district? One of today's hottest education debates is over that question, along with the ensuing tax ramifications. Some east-side Salt Lake County communities want to split from Granite and Jordan, two of the state's largest school districts, and create smaller, compact districts.

Nothing wrong with small districts. Some of the best districts in the state are small. But size isn't the only issue. The big problem is that the breakaway communities could create a major tax fairness issue, pitting the stable, built-out east side against the booming west, where dozens of new schools must soon be built.

The westerners could be facing big property tax boosts to pay for needed new schools, while the east side has more schools than it needs.

The Legislature, which granted the breakaway authority, could solve the problem fairly easily by equalizing school capital outlay taxes across the entire county. That means all school building costs would be totaled up for all districts in the county and a uniform countywide rate would be levied to meet those costs.

That makes sense because good public education benefits everyone. Senior citizens with no children in school depend on well-educated young people to pay their Social Security and keep the economy strong so their investments do well. Many of the children and grandchildren of east-side empty-nesters will be buying their first homes on the west side.

Story continues below
In time, the situation will correct itself as the booming west side is built out with residences and wealth-producing businesses that pay property taxes. Kennecott Utah Copper has been paying healthy property taxes for many decades, helping build schools across the valley.

Ideally, legislative action would occur in a special session this summer because some east-side areas may place small district proposals on the election ballot this fall. Before people vote, it would be nice to know the tax ramifications.

If capital outlay taxes were equalized, the benefits of small districts could be pursued without tax unfairness. It makes sense to create school districts around municipal or multimunicipal boundaries. Districts that are contained within a city or a couple of cities get more attention from city leaders, and there is a stronger feeling of belonging and community pride.

Salt Lake City, Provo, Logan and Murray, for example, have school districts matching city boundaries. Public education has emerged as a big issue in the Salt Lake City mayoral race.

So bring on smaller districts. But make it fair.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Broncos make Aggies pay

These message boards are for trading insults.....so if you don't want to be...

Boys basketball rankings

Did JD Books change his name to Porkins? Easy there fella

BYU has slim shot at BCS

RE: BYU accounting grad. Most employers could give a hoot about your...

Best of luck to this young man. I do hope they get him out soon!

SUU falls to Tennessee Tech

This team plays with very little heart at times. They had better step it up...

Bill Clinton was the unknown man on the grassy knoll.

Utahn is starving herself for Kenya

Like in all honesty her starving herself is going to get govt officials in a...

Where do I need to go to sign this petition. It is long overdue.

I understand her desire to spread the word and make a difference, but I...

Preps of the week

Reading is fundamental. Selected by ESPN as top player in state and signed...

Advertisements