State ed board refuses to set rules for private-school vouchers

Published: Thursday, May 3 2007 3:13 p.m. MDT

The state Board of Education declined to establish rules governing a private-school voucher program on Thursday, virtually ensuring it will miss its May 15 deadline and invite a lawsuit that could decide the fate of the program months before voters get their say.

Opponents of vouchers gathered enough signatures to force a statewide referendum on repealing the law, which offers parents $500 to $3,000 in state money for each child they send to private school.

But the Legislature passed a second voucher law that cleaned up and repeated many parts of the original, including deadlines the state school board would follow to implement the program. On Thursday, board members said legal and ethical questions would prevent them from meeting the May 15 deadline.

Chief among the questions was whether the board should create guidelines for a voucher program before voters decide whether they want one. The board was uncertain what rules the second, unchallenged voucher law allowed it to write.

"We simply cannot move forward," said board member Debra Roberts.

Instead, the board is asking Republican Gov. Jon Huntsman to call a special legislative session to rescind the second voucher law. Roberts said that would allow voters to decide whether they want a voucher program instead of a judge to decide the issue.

"Right now it's muddy waters, it's politics. It's a game that's being played," Roberts said.

However, some board members, including chairman Kim Burningham, have said they think the school voucher issue should be decided by the state Supreme Court.

"We hope that this delay is not another tactic intended to undermine the school choice law," Leah Barker, spokeswoman for several pro-voucher groups, said in a statement.

Messages left with Huntsman's office on Thursday were not immediately returned.

The idea of rescinding the second voucher law during a special session is one originally proposed by Sen. Scott McCoy, D-Salt Lake City.

"This would make it crystal clear that the referendum is about the issue of vouchers in general, a popular up-or-down vote on taxpayer-funded private school vouchers. If the referendum passes, the issue would be settled and the bill would bar the implementation of HB 148 and HB 174. If the referendum fails, then game on — Utah has a voucher program," McCoy wrote in a blog post.

Get The Deseret News Everywhere

Subscribe

Mobile

RSS