From Deseret News archives:

Friendly split for Pleasant Grove, Lindon?

Fire, police, ambulance service costs are issue

Published: Saturday, April 14, 2007 12:10 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
PLEASANT GROVE — After 25 years of sharing fire, police and ambulance services, Pleasant Grove and Lindon are now considering an amicable separation.

Pleasant Grove Mayor Mike Daniels said the "parting of the ways" may come because, as both cities have grown, operational costs have increased to the point at which Lindon would like a more detailed accounting and greater control over the services it is paying for. But Pleasant Grove isn't prepared to give Lindon what it wants.

"(Lindon) would like an accountability that we can't give them," Daniels said. "They want to know what they're paying for, and we're not really set up that way to provide the level of detail that they want. We can provide things like how many calls they had and how long those calls took, but if you start getting into the nitty-gritty of the type of call that was answered and was it more important or less important than another call ... you start to get into a level of reporting that we don't track."

Lindon has been linked to Pleasant Grove since 1982, but most recently, the city has been spending slightly more than $1.4 million per year for police, fire, EMS, animal control and dispatch services.

Story continues below
About a year ago, both cities considered forming a special service district to solidify their unity and possibly reconfigure their costs, but Daniels said the union would not have benefited Pleasant Grove as much as maintaining their own department currently does.

Now Lindon officials must decide if they want to branch out on their own, partner with another city or stay with Pleasant Grove for at least another year.

"Our overall philosophy as a city has been we feel that partnering with other entities means ... better service collectively, probably for less cost," said Lindon Mayor Jeff Acerson. "We feel that's a good working principle, but we may ... be big enough now that the viewpoint may change a bit, and we may be wise and prudent to provide that service by ourselves."

Daniels said Pleasant Grove hopes to know within a month or two whether the partnership will continue after July 1, 2008 — the beginning of the cities' next fiscal year. If Lindon decides to establish its own emergency service system, Daniels said Pleasant Grove will help them.

"Just because we're all looking at accountability to our areas, nobody should misunderstand that (our) cities don't have a good working relationship," Daniels said. "We're just trying to figure out how to best address the needs of our cities without creating a total fiasco for those involved."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

I find it interesting that many of the same people who say that we can't...

Cougs begin bowl preparations

None of these teams is going to be easy. They all have fine football...

Max Hall issues apology

Max, no apology was necessary, but the apology was polically correct. If...

Very good piece of writing, Amy. You summarized what many of us have been...

U. eyes bowl for redemption

How is a top 25 finish make Utah a top twenty team? I think what the poster...

Max Hall issues apology

90% of the BYU & Utah fans have class, and Hall knows it. If you don't...

This might be my favorite article I've ever read from the Deseret News. Kudos.

Y. student vanished in China

Thank you for not giving up and don't give up now brother and sister...

Child prostitutes don't get help

Dr. Lois Lee's work with children who are victims of child sexual...

Look at the preview for Pixar's "Up". The whole move is summarized in...

Advertisements