From Deseret News archives:

U.S. House says: Bring them home

Demos claim victory with the vote to withdraw troops from Iraq in '08

Published: Saturday, March 24, 2007 11:40 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Voting for the bill were 216 Democrats and two Republicans — Wayne Gilchrest of Maryland and Walter Jones of North Carolina. Of the 212 members who opposed the bill, 198 were Republicans and 14 were Democrats, including Utah's Jim Matheson.

The bill marks the first time Congress has used its budget power to try to end the war, now in its fifth year, by attaching the withdrawal requirements to a bill providing $124 billion to finance military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan for the rest of this year.

Excluding the funds in the House-passed bill, Congress has so far provided more than $500 billion for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, including about $350 billion for Iraq alone, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. More than 3,200 U.S. troops have died in Iraq since war began in March 2003.

Across the Capitol, the Senate planned to debate as early as Monday legislation that also calls for a troop withdrawal — and has also drawn a Bush veto threat.

That $122 billion measure would require that Bush begin bringing home an unspecified number of troops within four months with the goal of getting all combat troops out by March 31, 2008. Unlike the House bill's 2008 date, the Senate deadline is not a firm requirement.

Story continues below
While Friday's House vote represented Democrats' latest ratcheting up of political pressure on Bush, they still face long odds of ultimately being able to force a troop withdrawal.

In the Senate, Democratic leaders will need 60 votes to prevail — a tall order because they will need about a dozen Republicans to join them.

And should lawmakers send Bush a compromise House-Senate measure, both chambers would need two-thirds majorities to override him — margins that neither seems likely to be able to muster.

In Friday's House debate, Democrats said it was time for them to begin influencing the war's path.

"The American public expects the Congress of the United States to do something," said Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md. "Not simply to say 'yes' to failed policies, but to, on their behalf, speak out and try to take us in a new direction."

"What we're trying to do in this legislation is force the Iraqis to fight their own war," said Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., who had helped write the bill.

With Democrats holding 233 seats and Republicans with 201, Democrats were able to afford only 15 "no" votes. Accordingly, Pelosi and her leadership team spent days trying to convince members that the bill was Congress' best chance of forcing Bush to change course — an argument that was aided when they added more than $20 billion in domestic spending in an effort to lure votes.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

During the Protestant Reformation,Martin Luther pointed to (2Peter 2:9) "The...

Utah needs good examples

If we are all really being HONEST here, we must all admit that we, our own...

Disappearance called 'sususpicious'

Although I do not practice criminal law, I think there is an angle some folks...

Mania for Palin is a big mystery

Everyone is knocking comments that Palin lies alot as "leftist rhetoric", but...

Make sure you go early as traffic last night prevented some from attending.

Kobe's decade: On top at start, end

Too bad he is a rapist and a philanderer. I wonder what matters most?

Disappearance called 'sususpicious'

Remember the worst winter storm to hit Southern Utah? Roads and schools...

Pitta doesn't win award

Learn to spell. It is MORMON not MORMAN you doofus. By the way, I've seen...

Yippee! Another article to express hatred toward all the big bad Mormons....

BCS did TCU a favor?

The term holy war is nothing more than a sophmoric sports jounalist...

Advertisements