From Deseret News archives:

Utahns divided on gift-giving

Nearly equal numbers say '07 bill does, doesn't go far enough

Published: Sunday, March 18, 2007 12:09 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Utahns are split over whether a new lobbyist gift-giving bill that passed the 2007 Legislature goes far enough in disclosing which legislators are taking gifts from lobbyists.

The Deseret Morning News/KSL-TV poll shows that 49 percent of all Utahns believe there should be more disclosure of gifts, while 44 percent said the new bill probably goes far enough.

A third of Utahns said the new law definitely does not go far enough — more disclosure is needed.

A Dan Jones & Associates survey taken last month showed that 76 percent of Utahns either wanted all lobbyist gifts banned or wanted to know which legislators were taking gifts valued at more than $10.

The new law takes a small step, supporters acknowledge, toward more disclosure.

Legislators in both the House and Senate who said they want even more disclosure said any greater disclosure and the bill would have failed.

Had the new law been in effect this session it would have increased the reporting by name of a legislator who took a gift from 11 percent of all gifts given to just 13 percent, a study by the Morning News of recently filed lobbyist financial reports showed this past week.

During the 45-day general session that ended Feb. 28, 56 percent of all gifts given to lawmakers were meals, the newspaper's study found.

Story continues below

Few names came attached to those meals, because the food cost less than $50 in one day — the legislator-reporting-threshold in the current law.

But SB246 exempts the reporting of meals under $50 — just as the current law does.

Such a large loophole means there won't be many more legislators named in future lobbyists' gift-giving reports under the new law, the study found.

SB246 does say that all sporting tickets given must be accompanied with the name of the legislator who took them, regardless of how much the ticket costs.

Some legislators said that requirement was aimed at nam- ing leg- islators who take Jazz tickets.

However, the lower- bowl tickets at Utah Jazz games al- ready cost more than $50. And since lobbyists don't expect a legislator to take an upper-bowl ticket (at less than $50), then lobbyists who were taking lawmakers to Jazz games were already naming the legislators who took the more expensive tickets.

But the new law will likely capture less expensive sports tickets — like attendance at college and university games or at professional hockey, soccer and arena football games whose tickets are usually under $50 each.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
Deseret Morning News Graphic

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

Y fans trying to minimize the quality of two BCS wins by the U are hilarious....

Wow, lots of bashing of BYU profs here! Do you know who approves every...

Couldn't agree with you more! June can't come soon enough!

We have had two kids commit suicide at my school alone in the last 3 weeks,...

Bennett seeks to stall N-waste bill

If you want to vote Bob Bennett out of office, then you had better get...

Y. profs: Beck not all-knowing

I hope you're not trying to say that the Book of Mormon is about how bad...

USU shows clear improvment

You must be the same guy that predicted a 20 point BYU win over USU in...

If you're referring to "In God we trust" on money, the founding fathers...

George lost in rivalry hatefest

Remember Cougar fan, if the Utes had had their 2008 season back in 1984, then...

Interception ends comeback bid

Tim Tebow in the post-game interview: Alabama is a "...classy program,...

Advertisements