After watching its stock plunge 15 percent on Thursday, Usana Health Sciences filed a defamation lawsuit against Barry Minkow, a San Diego resident, who has claimed that the Salt Lake-based multi-level marketing company is little more than an over-priced pyramid scheme.

In a complaint filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in Salt Lake City, Usana charges that Minkow authored and published a report "calculated to defame Usana and lower its stock price, so as to allow Minkow to benefit from his short position in Usana's publicly-traded stock."

Minkow distributed a 500-page report to officials at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Internal Revenue Service.

The Wall Street Journal picked up the story, running it Thursday on the cover of its Money & Investing section.

That helped to fuel a sell-off of Usana's shares, which closed down $8.92 at $49.85 Thursday on the Nasdaq Stock Market. On Friday, Usana shares lost another 60 cents, or 1.2 percent, to $49.25.

"Minkow is simply looking to line his pockets based upon a hodgepodge of misinformation, half-truths and outright lies," said D.J. Poyfair, an attorney for Usana. "Usana is regularly identified as the gold standard in network marketing by state and federal regulators."

Minkow does not deny his stock interest in Usana. In fact, he said he disclosed his short position — 225 put options — in a letter to Usana that accompanied his report.

Usana issued a statement Friday saying that Minkow's campaign was financed by a paying client and Minkow will profit personally.

Minkow charges that Usana's senior management and directors exercised $95 million in stock options even as the company authorized $140 million in stock repurchases.

"None of that is illegal," Minkow said. "But where did they get the $140 million? From the people that they lied to and told that they were going to succeed in this multi-level marketing business. That's wrong. That's evil."

Minkow alleges that 85 percent of current Usana distributors are losing money and 74 percent of distributors fail within the first year.

"These distributors account for 86 percent of the company's multi-level marketing revenue," Minkow said. "In today's Internet economy, there is simply no need for multi-level marketing or the overpriced products that they sell, meaning that the only thing they are selling are memberships in anticipation that future memberships will be sold in the future, which is the classic definition of a pyramid scheme."