Plenty of clouds hover over 'sunshine laws'
Gaining access to public documents is still a challenge
Though laws in every state say government records and meetings must be open to all, reality often falls far short: Laws are sporadically enforced, penalties for failure to comply are mild or virtually nonexistent, as in Utah and Massachusetts and violators almost always walk away with nothing more than a reprimand, an Associated Press survey of all 50 states has found.
Even in the handful of states that monitor such cases, when citizens appeal over lack of access to information, the government usually wins and keeps public business secret.
Why does it matter?
Advocates for open government say public trust is at the heart of our democracy, that scrutiny keeps public officials honest, and that information is the foundation of informed debate.
"We're in an era, clearly, where there's a lot of distrust in government," said Bill Chamberlin of the Marion Brechner Citizen Access Project at the University of Florida. "The more the public officials are open in their conversation and show the documentation that they're basing decisions on, it's going to help the public have faith in what officials are doing."
The AP's survey conducted to coincide with Sunshine Week, a nationwide effort to draw attention to the public's right to know gathered material from each state on its open government laws and penalties. Additionally, for the years 2004 to 2006, it sought more detail on open government complaints in states with the best record-keeping. The AP found that fewer than 10 states effectively track what happens in such cases.
Looking more closely at those monitoring efforts, a snapshot emerges: Oversight agencies and attorneys general are more likely to rule in favor of government offices that keep documents secret and doors closed. And when they rule that the law was broken? The overwhelming majority of decisions bring a "don't do it again" warning.
In Fort Smith, Ark., a resident fought to learn what city officials were doing when they secretly decided to buy a vacant downtown building. David Harris proved in court that the officials broke the law, but the state Supreme Court last year declined to levy the only punishment possible the $10,000 in legal fees it cost Harris to make his case.
- News analysis: From confidence to confusion...
- Studies try to find why poorer people are...
- Olympic hurdler Lolo Jones says she's a...
- Where did Memorial Day originate?
- Does Romney's faith concern a quarter of...
- Astronauts enter world's 1st private supply ship
- Hunger in Africa stalks 1M children
- CIA remembers fallen covert operatives
- News analysis: From confidence to...
56 - Does Romney's faith concern a quarter...
46 - Search for Mitt Romney running mate in...
35 - Olympic hurdler Lolo Jones says she's a...
31 - Orrin Hatch is now the hunted —...
30 - Can U.S. schools adopt education...
25 - Maine churches fighting gay marriage
25 - Sarah Palin catches flak over her Orrin...
24







DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments